Showing posts with label eclipse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label eclipse. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 8, 2019

Twilight Time

What is this enigma; twilight? 

A simple definition:
twilight
  1. 1. 
    the soft glowing light from the sky when the sun is below the horizon, caused by the refraction and scattering of the sun's rays from the atmosphere. 

Twilight; Woodland Hills, August 5, 2016, 8:24 PM, photo by Julie O. /chthonickore 

 However, anyone who experiences a sunrise or a sunset knows that twilight is much more than a simple phenomenon of physics. It touches us on a subline level of the soul. It is a time between light and dark, day and night, rising and falling. It is a junction, neither day, nor night; the two meet briefly in ballance, they take a few steps together, and then one vanishes . . . but in their mysterious merging, they become something very unique. 



Pacific Coast, Ventura, December 20, 2014, 4:12 PM, photo by Julie O. /chthonickore

Crepuscular means "pertaining to or resembling twilight", from Latin crespuculum "twilight, dusk", related to creper "obscure, uncertain", from Proto-Italic *krepos "twilight", which is itself of creper (uncertain) origin. Maybe a bit like creepers, those shades of the night who hide in the shaddows. Shade from,
Middle English shade, shade, Kentish ssed, "dark image cast by someone or something; comparative obscurity or gloom caused by blockage of light," from late Old English scead "partial darkness; shelter, protection," also partly from sceadu "shade, shadow, darkness; shady place, arbor, protection from glare or heat". . . [OE]
People sometimes dress up as "shades" wearing sheets, so it is funny that these creeps who might appear at crepuscular times could be described as being "crapey". Crape meaning "a light thin fabric with a wrinkled surface is from Old French crespe "ruff, ruffle, frill", therefore like a veil, as is the twilight being a time between, the tween time; liminal.
Limin meaning "threshold” in Latin.

It is often in these ephemeral moments such as twilight that we are most acutely aware of our state here on earth, as creatures subject to time and change. Everything is in constant change and movement; cycles, cycles within cycles, spiraling out into endless space.


There is a fifth dimension beyond that which is known to man. It is a dimension as vast as space and as timeless as infinity. It is the middle ground between light and shadow, between science and superstition, and it lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge. This is the dimension of imagination. It is an area we call The Twilight Zone

It is a potent time, yet subdued. Fleeting yet timeless, still, muted, yet often bright with brilliant colors filling the horizon at the juncture of the vanishing sunset.

The Sun moves no more quickly at these junctions, yet we are more acutely aware of its movement as it touches the horizon than at other times of the day. It is not surprising that during a total solar eclipse we also experience a mystical twilight. It is only during these fleeting moments that the majesty of the sun's corona (crown) is revealed. We grow pensive in this half light. 
On hiding, the sun, which a moment before made everything twice, thrice, a hundred times greater and better with its complexities of the light and gold, now leaves all things, without the long transition of twilight, lonely and poverty stricken as though one had exchanged gold for silver first and then silver for copper. The town resembles a musty and valueless copper cent. How gloomy and unimportant the streets, the squares, the tower, the mountain roads. - Platero and I, Juan Ramón Juménez, translated by Eloïse Roach
According to the Online Etymology dictionary:
Exact connotation of twi- in this word[twilight] is unclear, but it appears to refer to 'half' light. . . Compare also Sanskirt samdhya 'twilight,' literally 'a holding together, junction,' [and] Middle High German zwischerliecht, literally 'tweenlight.'" Twilight [OE]

      Topanga, CA, June 4, 2018 , 7:41 PM, photo by Julie O. /chthonickore

So it is unclear what the original connotation of the "twi" in twilight is. However, it does make sense that this word would have the connotation of half light (1/2), -twi being related to the PIE root *dwo meaning "two," as in twice, twin, twine, and the German zwei "two", zwischen "between, zwielicht "twilight". 

But perhaps there is more to the story. . .

Looking at another word meaning twilight shows that there is another sense in which we might say this 'in between' light is related to the word forming sound 
-twi.
Gloaming is from Old English, glamoung meaning "twilight, the fall of evening", from glom "twilight", which is related to glowan "to glow" (hence, glow of sunrise and sunset). [OE]

So twilight is also named after this time of glowing. 



     Pacific Coast, Ventura, Dec. 24, 2014, 5:03 PM, photo by Julie O. /chthonickore

It is interesting, then, what is said about a seemingly unrelated word, seismic (as in seismic activity, or an earthquake). 

Earthquakes are powerful and also awe inspiring. The goddess Durga had seismic powers.
Upon encountering Durga, Mahishasura underestimated her, thinking: "How can a woman kill me, Mahishasur-the one who has defeated the trinity of gods?" However, Durga roared with laughter, which caused an earthquake and made Mahishasur aware of her powers." -Devi Mahatmya, www.dscourse.in/durga
Goddess Durga, fighting Mahishasura, the buffalo-demon, Early 18th century, Picture of the "Guler School"

The word Seismic is from the root seismo-
word forming element meaning "earthquake," from Greek seismos "a shaking, shock,; an earthquake," also "an extortion" (compare colloqial shake [someone] down), from seiein "to shake agitate, sway; to quake, shiver" from PIE root *twei- "to agitate, shake, toss; exite; sparkle" (also source of Sanskrit tvestai "to excite; to be excited, inflame, sparkle," and Avestan words for "fears" and "fright, danger"). [OE]

Therefore, seismio- being from *twei-, seems phonetically or by pronunciation to be connected to twi (the supposed root of twilight), because we say the “seis” in seismic with a long I sound just as we say "twi” in twilight. 

Certain words coming from seismo have to do with a kind of agitation of light, seemingly, rather than just having to do with shaking; such as, sparkle, inflame. So in that sense this *twei- may have connection to the naming of the time when deep fiery colors overwhelm the horizon. These colors can have an intensive and definite glow to them.

Another seemingly unrelated word in concept to twilight is the name of the star, Sirius. Stars are usually associated with night rather than twilight, yet the appearance of stars (and also planet "stars" like Venus) at sunrise and sunset are actually historically very important dates and times. 


Anton Raphael Mengs 1765 Hersperus As Personification of the Evening Star
Starlight star bright

first star I see tonight

I wish I may

I wish I might

Have the wish I wish tonight

In ancient Egypt, the 
star Sirius, the brightest star by magnitude, was looked for in the twilight after a 70 day absence (being hidden by the brightness of the sun during that phase). This heliacal rising (rising just before the sun) was important to the ancient Egyptians because it indicated the time of the annual inundation of the Nile which fertilized the black land and made growing possible, and it was celebrated as the New Year.
The first sighting of Sirius and its association with the rebirth of the Nile was so important that its heliacal rising marked the start of the Egyptian calendar year. Heliacal relates to the stars proximity to the Sun (Helios in Greek), at the time, Sirius made its first appearance in early July as seen from the ancient capital of Memphis, but due to the procession of the equinoxes, the star now rises into view in early August. Sky and Telescope; Sirius
A stellar Goddess, possibly Sopdet[Gk. Sothis, Latin Sirius 'the Dog Star', (Sirius also discussed here)], from the tomb of Seti I, c. 1300 BC

Therefore, the appearance of a star at its heliacal rising has to do with, and can be associated, by experience, with twilight. Not only is the sky bright and glowing at twilight, but the stars themselves; the stars that having been journeying in the underworld (absent from sight), can be described as shinny and sometime sparkling [remember one definition of PIE root *twei- "sparkling"]. So if star = sparkling we could say twei-light [twilight] is the majestic time of the appearance of this prominent starlight. Especially given the fact that a possible etymological origin of Sirius is also connected to the *twei root.
Latin Sirius rom Greek Seirios, said to mean literally "scorching" or "the scorcher" [*heliacal rising heralding the "dog days of summer", Sirius being found in the constellation of Canis Major]. But other related Greek words seem to derive from this use, and the name might be a folk-etymologized borrowing from some other language. 
An Egyptian name for it was Sothis [*actually Sopdet is the transliterated name from the Egyptian, and Sothis is the Greek rendering of this] Beekes suggests it is from PIE root *twei- "to agitate, shake, toss; excite; sparkle[OE] *my addition
Also, being associated with the underworld, death and rebirth, and thus the liminal; junctions, crossroads. The process of mummification interestingly, took around 70 days, just as the star Sirius spent 70 days in the underworld before its heliacal rising. The Egyptians were believers in resurrection of the body and life after death.
The ancient Egyptians' attitude towards death was influenced by their belief in immortality. They regarded death as a temporary interruption, rather than the cessation of life. To ensure the continuity of life after death  people paid homage to the gods, both during and after their life on earth. When they died, they were mummified so the soul would return to the body, giving it breath and life. Canadian Museum of History, Life After Death
  Resurrection scene from the tomb of Maya in Saqqara XIX Dynasty, Photo; ahramonline.

But death is always a solemn time, sometimes painful, sometimes frightening, at other times gloomy; death is a time of transition, and therefore a time in between; a kind of twilight time for a person; transition from life in this world to life in the next. Even the "good-est" of deaths dim the light in our lives, if even just for a time. 

As we see this from the death of Jesus. It is called Good Friday, but it really was a bit gloomy, as well as awe inspiring. It certainly shook things up when this 'Son' set.

And when Jesus had cried out again in a loud voice, he gave up his spirit. At that moment the curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom. The earth shook, the rocks split, and the tombs broke open. Matthew 27:50-52
Gloaming of the Christ, by Julie O. /chthonickore, 2003

Some people theorize that there was a lunar eclipse near the time of Jesus' death. And the gospels tell us that following his death there was an earthquake, and the curtain in the temple, the veil between God and man was split. At the time only the high priest could enter beyond the curtain to the Holy of Holies, and even then, only once a year to offer a blood sacrifice for atonement. We could say the curtain being torn down the middle illumined the liminal space, or barrier between God and human. The son was then placed in in the tomb and rose again on the third day. Just as the sun reaches a death and rebirth point at the winter solstice, and each and every day this drama is replayed in the microcosm of the day, i.e., The Day; day, night, morning; one day. The sun sets, day turns to night, light to darkness, and then rises again gloriously each morning. 
O happy fault that earned for us so great, so glorious a Redeemer. 
O felix culpa quae talem et tantum meruit habere redemptorem - Catholic Paschal Vigil Mass Exsultet

Depending on one's perspective and purposes, the light going to darkness is good, it is evil, or it is neutral, or even all at the same time. But one thing is true, without the darkening; without night, there is no morning.
One is fruitful only at the cost of being rich in contradictions . . .
Man ist nur fruchtbar um den Preis, an Gegensätzen reich zu sein . . . Friedrich Nietzsche, GötzendämmerungTwilight of the Idols

The ancient Egyptians even personified this drama of the sun, attributing the different stages of the sun's travels with certain gods. Interestingly, the god of the setting sun was Atum. And we call the setting or twilight of the year, when the light and dark momentarily meet in perfect balance, the autumnal equinox; and the season autumn.
Atum, Ra, Horakhty, and Khepri, made up the different aspects of the sun. Atum was the setting sun which traveled through the underworld every night. He was also linked with solar theology, as the self-developing scarab who represented the newly created sun. As a result he is combined with Ra (the rising sun) in both the Pyramid and Coffin texts as Re-Atum he who "emerges from the eastern horizon" and "rests in the western horizon". In other words as Re-Atum he died every night at dusk before resurrecting himself at dawn. . . In this form, Atum also symbolized the setting sun and its journey through the underworld to its rising in the east. Ancient Egypt Online; Atum

So, twilight can be both glowing and bright, but also somber and gloomy, reminding us of our own fleeting day, the day of our life, and our mortality.

Mom's burial, Feb. 15, 2019, Gloomy and Rainy. Why are people Glowing and Smiling then? Is this a Funeral or a Fun–eral?, photo Julie O. / chthonickore

Gloom (n.), is said to be,
. . . of unknown origin; perhaps from an unrecorded Old English verb or from a Scandinavian source (compare Norwegian dialectical glome "to stare somberly"), or from Middle Low German glum "turbid," Dutch gluren "to leer." Not considered to be related to Old English glom "twilight." [OE]
Gloom is related possibly to a word meaning "to leer" wich we could also call a kind of glare; a glare as in "a stare." A different kind of glare is the what the glowing light of the sun might create at the gloaming. And when a person glares they often narrow their eyes. If the eyes are analogous to the sun, then this closing of the eyes, is like the sun winking just above or below the horizon, which creates this atmosphere of gloaming, glare, and gloom. 

However it states that the etymology of "gloom" is not considered to be related to "glom" twilight . . . yet the origin, is unknown

Since the twilight can be described as both glowing and, also at times, a bit solemn or gloomy we can make a connection between these words, gloom and glomthrough the phenomenon of twilight. 
Twilight = Gloaming -> related to Glow
Twilight is Glowing 
Twilight is Gloomy
Gloaming (twilight), can be both glowing and gloomy at the same time. So glow and gloom are connected in the experience of twilight.


Twilight Tree, painting by Ailis O'Reilly, 2016, photo by Julie O. /chthonickore

Also since it is said that seismic (seismic events being events that can cause great fear and awe which we as also we could say of eclipses), is from root *twei- "to agitate, shake, toss; exite; sparkle", which is also the root of Avestan words for "fears" and "fright, danger," it's not crazy to think that gloom could be connected in some way to gloaming "twilight" and glow, seeing as how gloom (n.) itself can be the cause of sober or somber contemplation, and can inspire a state of internal gloominess or twilight, then places in between earth and heaven, matter and spirit, are brought to mind, which could be at times, frightening, even shaking us to the core.

In distillation, the 6th process in alchemy the substance is agitated (*twei-) or excited by the distillation. When a substance is heated in a distillation tube there might be sparks, and sparkling "shine as if giving off sparks." Spark (n) is from Old English spearca "glowing or fiery particle thrown off," from Proto-Germanic *spark- . These words call to mind the time when our bright shining sun (star) fades from view and other sparkling stars appear in the sky. The stars themselves are very agitated, i.e., always in explosive movement; fearful awe inspiring energy machines. Distillation itself is a sort of a *twei- light, or seismic (shaking) event. We could also say that distillation in its  psychological description is related to twilight.
[Psychologically] Distillation is the agitation and sublimation of psychic forces is [sic] necessary to insure that no impurities  from the inflated ego or deeply submerged id are incorporated into the next and final stage. Personal Distillation consists of a variety of introspective techniques that raise the content of the psyche to the highest level possible, free from sentimentality, and emotions, cut off even from one's personal identity. Distillation is the purification of the unborn Self– all that we truly are and can be. Alchemy Lab: Distilation 

 
     The Sower, Vincent Van Gogh, 1888
To prepare for the final stage, [during Distillation] we need to purify the spirit to make sure that it is free from any destructive forms of ego. Here we are planting the seed for the unborn transpersonal self – one that is free from the distinctions of the collective and the individual. To help it grow one has to nourish it – which can be done with various forms of contemplation, spiritual ritual or meditation. –Labyrinthos.co 
So much information distilled to make this post! I feel rich!
Oh, twilight, I knew I loved you so! I will surely meditate in thy light!








Friday, November 1, 2013

House of Horrors?

Matthias Grünewald, Tauberbischofsheim altarpiece(detail), 1523-1525

If you look at this picture objectively, it is pretty gruesome, as are many crucifixion images. However, most people don't view them as such because they are so used to the idea of the image and its significance. Such images are displayed in millions of homes, churches and places of prayer throughout the world. Why are images like this OK? Because this particular bloody foot happens to be the foot of Jesus. It is not something grotesque like a zombie foot. It is sacred art.

We might wonder, however, what someone visiting from a distant solar system would think if they saw some of our religious art, and different religious practices. We might wonder how they would describe what they saw here back on their home planet if they didn't bother to understand the significance, or were confused about what was going on and why. What if they judged us as being silly and unevolved already because we were not as advanced as they were? They might show a picture of the crucifixion to their children and say something like, "This is the God from Earth, Passio Christi, he is a horrible masochist who haunts people. He tells everyone they have to eat his flesh and drink his blood or they will be eternally tortured. He also tells children to hate their parents and only do what he says."

Zombie Meat Market-Foot(or, given a minor miscommunication, the foot of Passio Christi packaged and ready for consumption on Planet X.)

It is all about perspective isn't it? People aren't usually as objective as they would like to think. They imagine that how they view things just is so, and is right and correct. Other people who think or do things differently, are just stupid or silly, or at worst, are evil heretics who should be put to death.

Do you want to see something really scary? Are you sure? Here it is . . .

    Horus-Set

Are you horrified?

This is a depiction of Horus-Set. The name transliterated from the hieroglyphs to the English alphabet is Ḥrwy.fy. What's that? Horrify? No, ḥrwy.fy. It is usually translated as, "He of the two faces/or heads".

Is Horus-Set supposed to be some sort of monster? What is going on here? How could it possibly have an interpretation that is positive? The man has two heads AND they are both animal heads! Isn't that demonic?

Actually, Horus-Set was supposed to signify a balance of power. Horus was the Lord of the Black Land (fertile Nile area) and Set was the Lord of the Red Land (desert). Together they created balance. Originally Set, the more negative, or yin half of the ballance, was not demonized but honored along with Horus as a god or power. In later time periods Set came to be associated with evil.

However, this association with evil can happen to more positive gods or people as well when they aren't considered to be on "your team", or aren't part of your religion or race. It is Horus, the more possitive, or yang personification of the power of God in the ancient Egyptian religion whose name and titles can be suspiciously found in words such as "horrify"(hrwyfy), "horror" (Haw-Wer, Heru-ur,  r.w wr, meaning, 'Horus the Great'), and "heressy", (Herseisis, Har-si-Ese, "Horus, Son of Isis), "nefarious"(Nefer Hor, Nephoros or Nopheros, nfr ḥr.w, meaning 'The Good Horus'), and "whore"(Horus, Haru, ḥr.w, Coptic, HōrGreek,Ὧρος Hōros). 

And look at this. This was the orrigional "House of Horus".

    Hathor

The goddess Hathor, ḥwt-ḥr meaning, "mansion or house (like "hut", hwt) of Horus (hr)".

Hathor was the sky-goddess of love, beauty, motherhood, foreign lands, mining and music. Does that sound like a "house of horrors" to you?

I can understand this sort of thing happening to gods such as Set, the Lord of the Red Land, becoming a "Satan" figure because of his connection with storms, desert, and chaos.


    Set or Seth (Setesh, Sutekh, Setekh, or Suty)

People make judgements about adversity. All adversity is called "evil". When actually there seems to be a subtle distinction between what we call adversity and what we call evil. Adversity is an experience that can create positive outcomes. It creates growth, saviors and heroes. But evil is just bad. 

For instance, adversity is judged to be evil in the story of "The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil" in Genesis. It is one way of interpreting the events of the story.
Out of the ground the LORD God caused every tree to grow that is pleasing to the sight and good for food; the tree of life was also in the midst of the garden, and also the tree of the knowledge (da'ath) of good and evil. Genesis 2:9 
The word evil comes from Old English, yfel (Kentish evel)meaning "bad, vicious, ill, wicked". The word in Hebrew used to describe the knowledge of the tree in the garden is, ra' translated as, "evil", in English.  However ra', although it is sometimes translated as "evil" and "bad," can have the meaning of adversity, unpleasantness, giving pain, unhappy, hurtful, and not only moral badness or wickedness. 

Also, because the knowledge from the tree was said to make one "like God," 
For God knows that on the day you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will become like God, knowing (yada) good and evil(ra'). Genesis 3:5
is it more like God to have knowledge, as in experiential knowledge, of what we would call adversity, or of evil?  For it seems that to truly know something(and not just know of it, or hear of it), you have to be in communion with it, or be one with it. Just as we know sweet and sour after we actually taste sweet and sour foods, we know hot and cold after feeling the extremes of high and low temperatures with our bodies, and we know pleasant and painful sensations in the same way. We would say Jesus knew adversity in this way because he suffered, but would we say he knew evil? Does God know evil? Or is evil always just a fleeting perception? God intends everything for good and brings good from evil, even that which is done with bad intent, as is shown in the story of Joseph and his brothers. 
As for you, you meant evil (ra') against me, but God meant it for good in order to bring about this present result, to keep many people alive. 

So therefore, do not be afraid; I will provide for you and your little ones." So he comforted them and spoke kindly to them.  Genesis 50:20-21, New American Standard Bible
God does apparently at times intend ra'a (root of ra'), which is rendered as "evil" in some translations, such as this passage from the English Revised Version of the Bible.
For thus saith the LORD of hosts: As I thought to do evil (ra'a) unto you, when your fathers provoked me to wrath, saith the LORD of hosts, and I repented not; Zachariah 8:14, ERV 
But this ra'a here is just as often translated as "disaster," "bring harm," "punish", "treat badly," "afflict", or "destroy." So, God sometime intends to afflict people, but we are not supposed to think that when he does these things he is acting with evil intent or he is being bad, therefore it must be the case that ra'a is, in and of itself not wicked, but that it can be used with intent for good or bad, or to accomplish either meaningful/good or wicked ends.  

Ra / Re also happens to be the ancient Egyptian sun god.  Here he is depicted as a man with falcon head and disk of the sun encompassed by a cobra.

    Imentet/Amunet "The Hidden One" and Ra 1298-1235 BC, Tomb of Nefertari

The rays (Ra, Re) of the sun can be really intense and cause ra (adversity or affliction) but are they evil? They can seem evil when you are being scorched, like Jonah in the desert. But the same rays cause growth and warmth and give light.  Power can be perceived as evil when it causes an experience that is unpleasant, but we shouldn't truly put the label of evil on it unless it is, for the purpose of personal gratification, intentionally trying to cause harm for the sake of inflicting pain, i.e., comes from evil intent.

We can understand the association with evil, as well, with gods like Loki, who is the Norse counterpart of Set. Loki IS actually pretty "loco". He is the trickster god always causing trouble and adversity.

    Loki, Norse Trickster God, 16th Century Icelandic Manuscript

Loki is the father of Hel, of the wolf, Fenrir (who swallows Odin during the battle of Ragnarok), and the father of the Wold Serpent / Midgard SerpentJörmungandr. But he is also the mother (yeah, weird story) of Odin's wonderful eight-legged horse, Sleipnir who is described as, "the best of all horses".

    Sleipnir

If it weren't for Loki, the world of the gods would surely be more boring. He appears to be a force sometimes for good, and many times for adversity. He is called a god and not called a demon or Satan. However, he seems to have possibly contributed to the characteristics we think off as being demonic today. He even has the demonic looking facial hair and/or helm with horns in certain depictions.

And Set too, with his association with red, and the forked, or other times club looking tail of the set beast, whom he is represented by, has the look of what is now called a devil or demon, but he started out as the personification of a balancing power that was not called evil, but rather, adverse, difficult, or harsh.

    Set Beast or Animal

Sometimes the label of good and evil seems to be a matter of subjective opinion. If people like something, they say it is good, and if they don't like it, they tend to call it evil.  

Is darkness evil? No, darkness is not always evil. Sometimes darkness is just mystery and hiddeness. Sometimes darkness reveals secrets, like during an eclipse the corona ("crown") of the sun is visible to us, but is not visible at any other time. An eclipse or darkness would only be evil if it stayed that way and kept us in darkness forever. Some darkness is OK. A certain amount of darkness it is called night, and it is not evil because it is contained by light. Darkness is part of what we call Day, and the Day is good.

God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night.  And there was evening and there was morning, one day .  .  .  And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good. Genesis 1:5, 31

    Total Solar Eclipse


We might wonder what it would be like if there were never any night. In that case we might call day evil. Too much of a good thing can seem evil. Or what if there was only too much day, or night for long periods of time, like in the polar regions. It seems what we really seek is balance between the extremes. It is silly to vilify either light or dark, hot or cold, work or rest, or any polarity. In and of themselves they are neither good, nor bad.

What of this icon known as the Black Madonna?

      Our Lady of Jasna Gora, Czestochowa, Poland

One might wonder about this dark or sooty (Suty, happens to be another rendering for the name of the god Set) depiction of Mary. This dark image is venerated right along with the bright and light ones. What mysteries lie waiting to be revealed by this darkness? What glory is being shielded behind the veil of the woman? Is something being covered that we are being protected from, or aren't ready to see?  

Could it possibly be some aspect of the feminine or yin such as this?


      Kali Hindu goddess of time and change

Kali is "the Black One", the Hindu goddess of time and change.
  
Is she evil? She does have heads strung around her neck and she is standing in a pool of blood. But how would you feel about her if she was a mother protecting her children? How would you feel toward her if you were the child in need of protection and she was defending you? Sometimes it is good to have a mother bear looking out for you. It doesn't mean the power is not fearful however. 

Maybe some people aren't quite prepared to handle the reality of the kind of strength that lies within the dark, black, yin, feminine aspect of the divine. So it has been veiled in the western tradition. Or, when not veiled, it is vilified. Such as with Eve (Havvah "living") in the garden of Eden who was an agent of change. It is because of, Eve, the woman, that we are all sinners, that we are all stained with original sin, correct? What a whore!


    Adam and Eve, Lucas Cranach the Elder, oil on wood (c.1538), Prague

She should be ashamed for causing her husband to sin like that. She listened to the 
whispering voice, described as, nachash [Hebrew], i.e., a snake (nachash from its hissing sound, the hisser). This snake is equated with the devil, the deceiver (trickster?), and evil.

It is interesting to note, that later on, Elijah listens to a whispering voice as well (1 Kings 19:12). He listens to the whispering voice, i.e., "qowl ('voice') demamah ('whisper/silence') daqqah ('thin')," sometimes translated as the "still soft voice", but he is said to be talking to God, and is a great prophet. He then goes back to town and instigates a huge bloodbath of slayings, but this is OK because he was talking to the Lord, YHWH, and not a snake!


It seems that a judgement has been placed on the two events. The whispering voice that Eve listens to is called a snake and a deceiver, whereas, the whispering voice that Elijah listens to is said to be YHWH. This is because the motive for what Eve did, and the consequences of what Eve did were judged as "evil"(Eve-ill), rather than causing the experience of adversity. Even though adversity is apparently a type of knowledge that God has, a kind of shame is put onto the action, i.e., she is a wicked "sinner" for disobeying God and being the cause of our experiencing "evil". On the other hand, we are told not to think badly of what Elijah does, even though it appears to be harsh, because he was doing it under the orders of God.  

We should remember too, that although the eating of the fruit of knowledge (da'ath) of adversity brought with it the experience (yada) of adversity, and especially adversity in the form of death, it is also because of this action of Eve, which was done out of her innocence (she was created in a state of grace and innocence), that we (the adam, ha'adam) became like God.
. . . "Behold, the man (ha'adam) has become like one of us, knowing good and evil . . ." Genesis 3:22, ESV
It seems that, to be like God, should be a good thing. We could consider this fall as being a necessary part of God becoming man, and man becoming God, just like a baby upon leaving the womb first begins to experience adversity in the manner of coldness, hunger, breathing, digestion, etc., but it is a necessary step in joining the human race. Is it a fall, then, as in "wickedness and evil", or a fall, as in "the falling/swinging of a pendulum", i.e., the experience of polarity and duality? Perhaps it was a fall, as in, from no change, to a state of change and movement, from timelessness, to the spinning of the wheel of experience. Or, simply put, that which occurs when the spirit(in the image and likeness of God) is incarnated in the flesh and becomes an adult.  This is just the order of creation, 

Day, Night, Day .  .  .  One Day.


        Taijitu

Actually, fall is my favorite time of year. It begins at a time of equilibrium, as the balance is shifting from the predominance of yang energy to the predominance of yin energy. It's not evil, its just an experience.

Think of the name "Katrina", is it infamous to you at all? If it is, it certainly didn't start out that way, but became infamous by association with an event that people judge as being a horrible event.

      Hurricane Katrina infrared Immage, Aug. 29, 2005 

Is it a storm or a monster?

Horrible is from the  Latin horribilis "terrible, fearful, dreadful". To be those things is not necessarily bad or evil. God is horrible in that respect. I'm sure Pharaoh thought the God of Moses was horrible, or even, evil when he killed his firstborn son.

This sort of thing is also illustrated nicely in the musical, "Wicked".  Is a witch good or bad? Is a good witch good or bad? Is a wicked witch good or bad? Which witch is which? What?

Is it an insult to be called a witch?


            Good or Bad Witch?

Or, if someone says that you are horrible, terrible, or a witch, or any other such "insult", should you take it as such, or could you maybe take it as a compliment, just like it is a compliment on Halloween?  

It's all a mater of perspective.


    Horrible Picture of Jack Skellington on a Crucifix- by Julie O. / chthonickore

Happy Halloween!  Happy Samhain!

Have a horrible, terrible, fearful evening!