Showing posts with label magician. Show all posts
Showing posts with label magician. Show all posts

Saturday, July 3, 2021

The Magician – I

Le Tarot de Marseille

One is the loneliest number. But, the funny thing is, it wouldn't be lonely if weren't for two. If not for a second thing not being there, one wouldn't be alone, rather it would actually be all one. When something exists, by the fact of its distinction from the ALL, then it is another, i.e., "a second of two." 

Being alone ("all "+ an "one") isn't bad if you are actually everything, like the unmanifest, unsearchable, eternal God. But once anything exists apart from the perfect Unity, which is what any created thing or creature is by its very nature, then being alone can be lonely. And any created creature is also by its nature more lowly than the creator.

The Creation of Adam, Michelangelo, c. 1508-1512, ceiling of Sistine Chapel, Vatican City

This makes every person single from Latin singulus "one, one to each, individual, separate," from a form of the root *sem- "one; as one, together with," but not integer, that is, "untouched," from in- "not" + tangere "touch", from PIE *tag- "touch, handle." No, we are creatures tagged by God. We are very much touched, and very much separate as individuals.

Shem / Šem the oldest son of Noah, means "name" in Hebrew. We don't know what Noah and his wife had in mind in calling their son "Name", but surely they hoped it would be a good name. Perhaps there was even some connotation of this name as denoting their son as their first, #1, seminal or *sem- "one" child. In any case, a person's(or a thing's) name can be either good; a name of fame or renown, or it can be bad; a name of ill repute or shame, given the particular state of their reputation. Even this name meaning "name," shem, could be a name of shame meaning "byword". 

then I will pluck you up from my land that I have given you, and this house that I have consecrated for my name [šem], I will cast out of my sight, and I will make it a proverb and a byword [šem] among all peoples. 2 Chronicles 7:20

One is actually perfection and a name of "God," Monad, the origin of everything, the source of everything else. One is frightening and powerful in that respect. Yet we, as creatures can only experience one in relation to other numbers, so it is also lowly, being the first, as in the lowest number of a sequence. Everything that comes after is bigger and more. Like 1 on a scale of 1-10. However, we also say "number one," as being the best, the top. 

The Magician holds a bit of this duality of dignity in its history. In the earliest tarot decks it is Le Bateleur in French and Il Bagato in Italian, the mountebank, who might be a charlatan or swindler, who uses illusion, trickery and sleight of hand to gain money, power or position. 

The Italian name Il Bagatto (a word derived from bagatelle, a little thing) refers to the card's roll in the game Tarocchi. It is the lowest-ranking card in the trump series, vulnerable to being captured by any other trump card. Eventually, the word came to mean sleight-of-hand tricks, deception, fraud and swindling. The French name, Le Bateleur, has the same meaning.  Tarot Heritage -all about tarot history and historic decks

Salvador Tali Tarot, Taschen Books, first published 1984

However, in more modern tarot decks the I card is sometimes named The Magus (a word derived from Latin magi, singular magus "magician, learned magician"). And  in general, The Magician, whatever it is named, has a positive interpretation in tarot readings. 

The Magician – (some) keywords: skill, self-confidence, will, creative power, control, dexterity, mastery, ambition, domination, strategy 

Shadowscapes Tarot, Stephanie Pui-Mun

So, sometimes the same word can be used at different times as a name of respect, or as a name of shame. Such is the case with magician. It can be applied to someone like Le Bateleur, the mountebank,  or it can be applied to someone who is a knowledgable alchemist, someone is knowledgeable about causes, a worker of powerful magic, like Merlin, or worker of miracles like Jesus.

How do we tell the difference? It's not always clear at first, but we can always look to results or fruits. For example, Jesus preformed wonders and cured people of disease and sickness. The question wasn't whether he was efficacious or not, it was if he was "allowed" to be doing these things. When Jesus cured the man blind from birth. The man did not question Jesus' powers because he was cured as a result of them.

He replied, "Whether he is a sinner or not, I don't know. One thing I do know. I was blind but now I see!" John 9:25

And if we remember, back in the time of Moses, in ancient Egypt there were powerful magicians who, "did the same things" as Moses "by their secret arts." 

So, Moses and Aaron went to Pharaoh and did just as the LORD commanded. Aaron threw his staff down in front of Pharaoh and his officials, and it became a snake. Pharaoh then summoned wise men[chakamim] and sorcerers[kashaphim], and [they] the Egyptian magicians[chartome / ḥartummê] also did the same things by their secret arts[lahatehem]; Exodus 7:10-11

Chartom חרטם is translated as "magician" [ḥartummîm "magicians"], however(according to the NAS exhaustive concordance), literally it has the meaning "engraver, writer," from the same root as cheret "engraving tool, stylus". Writing and words in general were considered to have magical power. In ancient Egypt this concept of magic was called heka. 

Heka referred to the deity, the concept, and the practice of magic. Since magic was a significant aspect of medical practice, a physician would invoke Heka in order to practice heka. The universe was created and given form by magical means, and magic sustained both the visible and invisible worlds, Heka was thought to have been present at creation and was the generative power the gods drew upon in order to create life. Heka, World History Encyclopedia

These wise men and sorcerers,  "magicians", were the educated writers and engravers of hieroglyphs [from Gk. hieros "sacred" + glyphein "to carve"], called medu-netjer "words of the God" in the ancient Egyptian language, or the prescribers of such engravings, carvings and spells. The cheret "stylus" is a pointed instrument, like a wand, used to carve or write words, i.e.  "to cut". This word is charats  in Biblical Hebrew, meaning "to cut, sharpen, decide, utter, decree, determine." They were very skilled at their craft.

The magician-priest-physicians, cutting with sharpened tools made decrees and uttered spells of magic to determine outcomes. When acting as priest-magician-physicians the chartomim would have used carved amulets and wrote/"engraved" magical prescriptions (sometimes which words were even dissolved and eaten by the patient). 

The sem priests were magicians who preformed ceremonies for the dead, ceremonies which include specific utterances, to promote safe passage in the afterlife and insure the use of the senses, such as the Opening of the Mouth ceremony where a specific ritual "cutting" instruments were employed such as a ritual adze and peseshkef  were used to, what we might say, "cut"(charats), i.e. open the mouth of the deceased. 

When participating in the funerary ceremony, the sem priest wore the leopard-skin mantel that covered most of the otherwise bare upper part of the body . . . The Opening of the Mouth ritual transformed the deceased into an akh, the reanimate spirit that was a crucial element of the ancient Egyptian concept of the soul. Preforming this rite on a mummy enabled the spirit of the deceased to breathe, speak, see, hear, and receive offerings of food and drink. Sem Priests of Ancient Egypt, Ancient Origins

Sem Priest with Ritual Adze

So the ancient Egyptian magicians were skilled carvers in more ways than one. They were skilled with carving words, spells, amulets, and also using "carving" or "sharpened" instruments for ritual. They were also skilled physicians. 

The Egyptians were advanced medical practitioners for their time. They were masters of human anatomy and healing mostly due to the extensive mummification ceremonies. This involved removing most of the internal organs including the brain, lungs, pancreas, liver, spleen, heart and intestine (Millet et al., 1980). Herbal Medicine in ancient Egypt

Magic and medicine were not completely separate disciplines in ancient Egypt. The carving of a physician on the body, i.e. surgery,  is arguably even more important than the carving of the words(prescriptions and spells), at least there is more immediately at stake for ones life going under the knife. It is very important to intrust ones wellbeing, both physical and spiritual, to a person who is  skilled at their craft.

Carving is a type of craft, which is from Old English cræft "power, physical strength, might"(from the same Germanic root as the German Kraft "strength, skill" and Sweedish kraft "strength". It is the case that the thing a person becomes powerful(cræfty) at is also a the thing they are skilled(Kraft-y) at. And like all craftsmen, there are those who are very skilled and those who are not so skilled. And of those who are not very skilled there are some who are posers and pretend like they are more skilled than they are for their own advantage. We call these charlatans. There is not always a clear distinction between a true magician / the magus / miracle worker and, the charlatan. Rather there is a certain of amount of skill and efficaciousness one person displays compared to the next.

Charlatan "one who pretends to knowledge skill, importance, etc." is taken from French charlatan  meaning "mountebank, babbler," from Italian ciarlatano "a quack." Mountebank is also taken from Italian, montambanco, a contraction of month in banco meaning "quack, juggler," literally "mount on a bench" (to be seen by a crowd)"[OE]. However, a juggler, beyond its modern typical meaning of throwing around balls and clubs, also can refer to, "one who preforms tricks or acts of magic or deftness [so someone we would generally refer to as an "illusionist" or "magician" nowadays]. Another meaning of juggler is "one who manipulates especially in order to achieve a desired end[Merriam-Webster]." In the original sense the term juggler was used to mean "magician" in the sense of a kind of trickster or "joker, the original term being taken from Latin ioculari meaning "to joke, jest." And they both, jugglers and magicians preform many of their tricks adeptly using their hands .

The connecting notion between "magician" and "juggler" is dexterity. Especial sense "one who practices sleight of hand, one who preforms tricks of dexterity" is from c. 1600 OE

So a juggler is a "magician" of a different sort than the more serious chartom of ancient Egypt, or magi of the east. A magician may be a charlatan who is a very skilled  or crafty juggler of objects or words, but, finally, is not one who is a master of or the more subtle causes of nature, and who is thus able to produce alchemical transformation, wonders, cures, etc. Adeptly hiding a ball under a shell to make money off of passers by is a lesser kind of magic than bringing sight to the blind.

Magus is a term taken from Latin magus(pl. magimeaning "magician, learned magician" from the Greek term magosused to describe the Persian learned and priestly class as portrayed in the Bible, from Old Persian magush "magician" possibly from PIE root *magh- "to be able, have power."

Spolia Tarot, artwork by Jen May

In this respect we might say that God the Creator is the best magician (and therefore best craftsman[or we might even say, carafe-man like the ancient Egyptian Khnum the "Divine Potter," "Lord of created things from himself," whose hieroglyph was a large water jug(khnm), aka a carafe]) of all, or The Magician par excellence. [I previously explored magic/heka in this post, excerpt below, He's a Magic Man, July 31, 2020]

Creation is a dark mysterious statement. All that is, was, and ever will be was fashioned in a single moment, or named [or spoken(spelled)] in a single Word of perfection. It is this concept that allows for magic. There is a single template(the Logos/Word/OM) we are traveling in, around and through at every moment. It is because of this fixed reality of ordered infinity that we get magic(heka) as the offspring of the omnipotent creator of the universe. An unmagical world is not the product of an omnipotent Magh-ician. Magic is the result of the self similarity and nature of oneness which makes up the universe. The image which is creation at all levels(both the macrocosmic and microcosmic levels) is perfect and can never be compromised or altered in any way fundamentally. It is an image of the ALL. He's a Magic Man, Chthonic Kore

Just because there are a lot of quacks and charlatans, does not make magic a base thing or a hoax. Rather those who claim to be magicians, but are really jokers, tricksters, charlatans and quacks give the word "magician" a bad name. This is why different terms are applied(or different names given) to make distinctions along the way. Such as saying Jesus preformed miracles instead of saying he preformed magic, a term which is too caught up with its association with charlatans and entertainers. Miracle itself simply comes from the idea that what Jesus did was astonishing, amazing and wonderful, coming from Latin miraculum meaning "object of wonder." Jesus was a wonder worker.

In this sense we could say that Jesus himself was a powerful wizard. Wizard being from Middle English wys "wise" + -ard. Jesus is shown many times in early Christian art preforming his miracles with a wand in hand. So this would make him a type of chartom(magician) as well.

[1] The raising of Lazarus, Sarcophagus in Lateran, forth-century, [2] Fresco, Raising of Lazarus, Catacomb of Priscilla, Rome, early to mid-third century, [3] Multiplication of the Loaves, Via Anapo catacomb, third- or fourth-century, [4] Jesus Raising the Dead, Marble, sarcophagus fragment, fourth-century

Which brings us back to the term Le Bateleur

Bateler has the meaning in French "to conjure, do magic tricks; to juggle," and these are people who often have things like batons, from French bâton "stick, walking stick, staff, clubwand,in their hands doing tricks and preforming magic.

While the magician[in order to focus / direct energy . . . or distract /divert attention] uses a wand for a different purpose than the juggler[to throw and catch], they both must be very skilled with their use of their wands. The best magicians and jugglers make it look easy.

Both the magician / illusionist / sleight of hand artist and juggler must be so practiced at their craft that it becomes second nature, in order to impress their audience. Success, for the magician / juggler comes in this form of  what is called "concentration without effort" as described in Meditations on the Tarot.

Concentration without effort is the transposition of the directing center of the brain to the rhythmic system – from the domain of the mind and the imagination to that of morality and will. The great hat in the form of a lemniscate which the Magician wears[in the Tarot de Marseille], like his attitude of perfect ease, indicates this transposition. For the lemniscate (the horizontal 8: ) it is not only the symbol of infinity, but also that of rhythm, of the respiration and circulation – it is the symbol of eternal rhythm or the eternity of rhythm. The Magician therefore represents the state of concentration without effort, i.e. the state of consciousness where the center directing the will has "descended" (in reality it is elevated) from the brain to the rhythmic system, where the "oscillations of the mental substance" are reduced to silence and to rest, no longer hindering concentration. 

Concentration without effort – that is to say where there is nothing to suppress and where contemplation becomes as natural as breathing and the beating of the heart – is the state of consciousness (i.e. thought, imagination, feeling and will) of perfect calm, accompanied by the complete relaxation of the nerves and the muscles of the body. It is the profound silence of desires, of preoccupation, of the imagination, of the memory of discursive thought. One may say that the entire being becomes like the surface of calm water, reflecting the immense presence of the starry sky and its indescribable harmony. . .   Meditations on the Tarot, A Journey into Christian Hermeticism, Letter I The Magician, p.10

So all these different types of "magicians" whether juggler, charlatan, or magus, must be so practiced and skilled at their craft, whatever it is that it comes almost effortlessly and fluidly. 

Some skills, however, come more easily and readily to certain people than to others. For example, one person may pick up an instrument and learn to play it better than another who practices for an equal length of time, given their particular natural "God given" gifts and talents. Therefore to become a great musician,  or "magician" of a craft is admirable especially to those who do not possess the same natural skill sets and would never reach the same level of mastery(craft) even with years of practice and effort. To these(those unskilled or less skilled in the same craft), the ability of the magician does seem truly magical, and for the magician their own ability is a source of power(*magh-) and magnetism.

Leonard Bernstein, conductor, composer, pianist, author, humanitarian(1918-1990) conducting with wand / baton

The magician, the one with power and craft, creates and makes things happen. The magician is a handy(skilled) maker. Make is said to be from PIE root *mag- / *mak- "to knead, fashion, fit." Here again, the maker, par exelence, would be God.

Does a clay pot dare argue with its maker, a pot that is like all others? Does the clay ask the potter what he is doing? Does the pot[poal "the work"] complain that its maker has no skill[yadayim "hands; ability"]? - Isaiah 45:9, Good News Translation, [see Hebrew]

Khnum the Divine Potter (father of Heka) fashions Ihy on his potters wheel, Temple of Hathor, Dendera[detail from Inner Shrine]

The Divine Maker took a mass "irregular shaped lump, body of unshaped coherent matter," from Old French masse, from Latin massa "needed dough, lump, that which adheres together like dough," from PIE root *mag- / *mak- "to knead, fashion, fit," and magically fashioned it into the first humans, i.e. the adam, ha.adam (who was made out of the "dust" of the adamah Gen 2:7), 

male and female created he them, and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created. Genesis 5:2 ASV, Hebrew Interlinear

What has mass is what is malleable and therefore the lump, the massa was formed by the creator/maker to make a mas, which means "male" in Latin, and is the root of the English word male. A male is a mass made into flesh and bone like Adam. Interestingly enough, this male named "man," that is, Adam, then acted as "female," when God took or "sucked" [the fe in female is from PIE dhe(i) "to suck"] from his flesh and bones, i.e. his mass, to make Eve. The female, which is said to mean literally "she who suckles," therefore the "mas that suckles(fe)," or we could say, perhaps even more properly, the mass that is sucked from (even while suckling young). The female is the one who creates and sustains new life through a transfer of matter, as a woman does when a baby is gestating in her womb (and then furthermore through milk production), which is definitely very magical. 

Me acting as female 2012, photo Julie O. /chthonickore

And in this respect even if a man gestates a baby in his womb he is still acting as "female" according to the etymological origin of the term. He is still giving of (or being sucked[fe] from) his own mass to create a new person. In this way we could say what matters for the term male and female is matter. Basically every person is a lump of matter and some people get matter sucked from their own mass to make new individuals. The vast majority of the time the people who do this identify as female and are women, so the terms take on assumed meanings and connotations which can give these words a bad name or loaded meaning, not unlike the word "magician." A lot is assumed about a person through these terms "male" "female" "masculine" "feminine" "man" "woman" etc. This is why words / names matter, and naming is itself a form of magic. Naming is creative. Naming is powerful. Words can and do hurt, and words can and do heal.

The Egyptians believed that if you knew someone's name, you had power over it. If you wrote the name of a dangerous animal or evil spirit on pottery and smashed it you were symbolically killing the evil. So called "execration texts" have been discovered all over Egypt particularly near burial areas. According to one myth all Egyptians were given a secret name at birth by the goddess Renenutet* which was never disclosed to protect them from harm. Names in Ancient Egypt, Ancient Egypt Online 
*Ren [pl. renu] meaning "name, identity" was one of the parts of the soul in ancient Egypt.

In ancient Egypt names[renu]were protected within "magic / heka circles" called shen / šn, meaning "encircle" [and if people were given new renu, it was a kind of magical renewal / renu-al]. A cartouche is a type of shen ring encircling a persons name / ren

Engraved Cartouche of Hapshepsut(1507-1458 BC) - on obelisk, Luxor, Egypt

In this way a written (i.e. spelled) name was a spell within a spell and it is clearly denoted as being one, one thing, one name, a unity. Like *I*, meaning [me] or one.

I

The Magician. One; lowly or mighty, infamous or renowned, charlatan or magus, tricker/illusionist or maker/creator, man or god? The proof will have to remain in the pudding!
Be careful what you wish for . . . 







Tuesday, August 13, 2019

Come in for a Spell


We create our reality with our stories, both individually and collectively. What we give our attention to influences what we feel and how we feel, what we do, and what we say. We tell ourselves good stories, or bad stories. In fact our reality is largely influenced by our history, our collective stories, i.e., our his-stories and her-stories that we have written in history books, and / or told by word of mouth, even what we tell ourselves, i.e., my-stories. However these stories can change, and do change. 


The history of the world, photo by Julie O. /chthonickore

The stories we tell ourselves can be either limiting or inspirational. Is it simply a mystery what makes up one's reality? When we tell stories we are doing something very powerful. We are spelling out, informing (telling) our present, that place where we are . . .  and where we are influences our future. Whatever the future holds, we are writing that story right now, but people often don't respect what powerful creators we are. 


Spell has a complex history and has evolved different common usages over time. Generally when we think of "spell" we mean, spell (v.1), early 14c."read by letter, write or say the letters of," the meaning of which seems to have come by way of (according to the online etymology dictionary) a French word, espeller, rather than the Old English spellian "to tell, speak, discourse, talk", espeller, meaning "mean, signify, explain, interpret," also, "spell out letters, pronounce, recite", both said to come from the same  Germanic root, *spellam "to tell", from PIE *spel-(2) "to say aloud, recite." 


A spell (n.1) is a "story, saying, tale, history, narrative, fable; discourse, command," from Old English spell, as in gospel (good + spell), the good news. Good stories are inspirational and have the power to change the world in seemingly magical ways. We have magic at our fingertips and enchantments spilling from our lips every time we write, or speak. 


A good spell written by my sister at the beginning of a blank book, now full of other spells.

Yet how many people believe this? Many have the idea that history is solid objective reality. History is something that simply happens to us. What we think, what we do, what we concentrate upon, or let into our lives, isn't really important. It is out of our hands. 

Is this a bad boy? What's the story? 

And in a way this is true if you hand over your power to "his" story, and don't think for yourself. But, history is largely made up of people's stories, and these "tellings" (spellsare creative. They have the power to create positively, or negatively which impacts both personal reality and the reality of the world. 

Even if you just think of it on this simple level . . . have you ever walked into a room of angry or sad people and felt it? How did it make you feel? Inspired? Did it give you energy, or did it bring you down? I think we all know this, we would rather walk into a room with people who were happy, or hopeful. What we experience influences our actions, how much energy we have, and a whole host of other things. 

Why are people more likely to finish their race when people are rooting for them? Why is it harder when people are telling you that they expect you to fail and you're a looser? What is in our environment, and therefore too, what we choose to bring into our environments influences us, changes our histories, changes our worlds. So, you are in fact a powerful creator when you are conscious of this, when you are a conscious creator. We are the movers and shakers.

A phoenix, related to the benu bird of ancient Egypt who cried out (spoke the spell, the word) and creation came into existence

Spell didn't come into usage as a term for magic spells, a "set of words with supposed magical or occult powers, incantation, charm" until the 1570's, but undoubtedly the notion was still there before this time. When a person preforms / casts a spell they are trying to affect reality. They want to change the story in a take charge kind of way. Whatever you say about these magicians, they know that they are responsible in very significant ways for what "reality" they experience. 

In biblical Hebrew kashaph means, "to practice sorcery, sorcerer, sorceress", f
rom a primitive root meaning properly "to whisper a spell". 
Pharaoh then summoned wise men [chakam] and sorcerers [kashaph], and the Egyptian magicians[chartom] also did the same things by their secret arts [lahat]. Exodus 7:11

The Children's Bible, Western Publishing Company, Inc. pp 108-109, photo by Julie O.


What else is this word kashaph (sorcerer) whisperer reminiscent off? It is like the snake in the Garden of Eden, the nachash, the word nachash coming from the sound a snake makes. A snake is a "hisser (kshhhh, chash).N
achash also has the meaning of "practice divination, enchanter." In this case the snake was an enchanter / bewitcher / speller. The snake cunningly whispered to Eve hiss story and changed the history of mankind, i.e., the human / man (ha adam), the people whom God had created.
For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil  Genesis 3:5
Lahat, above [Exodus 7:11], is translated as "magic arts", or "enchantments," and has the literal meaning of "a flame, flaming" It is interestingly the same word used to describe the "flaming whirling sword", the haphak [to turn] cherub [sword] which was used to guard the way to the tree of life along with the kerub [cherubim], after Adam and Eve were cast out.
After he drove the man out, he placed on the east side of the Garden of Eden cherubim and a flaming sword flashing back and forth to guard the way to the tree of life. Genesis 3:24

Shaddowscapes Tarot Deck, Two of Swords: stalemate, an impasse, difficult decisions, avoidance, weighing options

So, these cherubim, i.e., "swords [cherub] of God (?)," "messengers [angels] who are like swords [cherub], or who smite down [charab] for God (?)," they guard the way to the tree of life with a flaming [lahat], i.e., "enchanted" turning sword. And the kapash [spell whispers, sorcerers] of Egypt, also did their magic by certain "flaming [lahat]," enchantments, when they copied the tricks Aaron was preforming by the power of YHWH, who was finally the greater / better speller
They threw down their staffs, which also became serpents! But then Aaron's staff swallowed up their staffs.  Exodus 7:12
And notice this, chartom is translated as "magician," but actually means "engraver, writer". How interesting, the engravers, i.e., carvers of the hieroglyphs were thought of as magicians. They must have been pretty good spellers too.

Hieroglyphics is the name given to the writings of the ancient Egyptians by the Greeks, from hieros "sacred, filled with the divine, holy" + glyphe "carving".  The Egyptians themselves called their writing mdju netjer "words of the gods."
The ancient Egyptians believed that writing was invented by the god Thoth, and called their hieroglyphic script "mdju netjer" ("words of the gods"). The word hieroglyph comes from the Greek hieros (sacred) plus glypho (inscriptions) and was first used by Clement of Alexandria. https://www.omniglot.com/writing/egyptian.htm

Weighing of the Heart Ceremony [detail], Thoth "Lord of Divine Words", i.e., writing, recording the outcome

Its most important function was to provide a means by which certain concepts or events could be brought into existence. The Egyptians believed that if something were committed to writing it could be repeatedly "made to happen" by means of magic. Egyptologist Rosalie David https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.ancient.eu/amp/1-15434/ 
So, for the Egyptians their writings were literally spells. And the hieroglyphic system lended itself well to this kind of spelling. It was a more holistic type of written communication than written English, or maybe we could say, it incorporated more right-brained (nonverbal, feelings, intuition, visualization) features along with the left-brained (verbal, logical, linear) than English does. For one thing, English uses the Roman alphabet which is more evolved and, therefore, removed from the pictorial meanings behind the letters, or the pictograms they evolved from. The letters we use in English can seem to be arbitrary in shape. We learn the names and sounds of the letters and construct words, and the words can then create pictures in our minds, but the symbols themselves are not usually associated with objects or animals. They are simply letters that represent different sounds of the spoken language [however there is a great amount of history written / encoded etymologically in English which is very magical, and with our black mirrors (smartphones), it's never been easier to access this magic].

Mdju netjer (hieroglyphic writing) was both pictorial (a picture says a thousand words) and phonetic. Phonograms, logograms, and ideograms made up the basis for hieroglyphic script. 

Sometimes the symbols / pictures were used to represent one, two or even three letter combinations (phonograms). In English, th, ch, sh are examples of phonograms. Other times certain symbols were used to represent a whole word or phrase (logogram), such as how we use the Arabic number symbols (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9). We say "nine" when we see the symbol "9". We can read this logographic sentence, 👁🧡 U, or the same phrase in one symbol, 🤟. 
Sometimes the symbols were meant to represent a concept (ideograms) and were used as determinatives which were not spoken, but rather gave certain extra context, or meaning to the sentence, not unlike how we use certain emojis 😀
Determinatives were also used to distinguish homophones (words having the same pronunciation but different meanings), such as fly [the insect 🦟] and fly [the verb 🛩], and they could also serve as word dividers (in English we often just use a blank / white space). 

Hieroglyphic script could also be written either left to right , right to left 
←, or vertically in columns ↓, and there was a certain amount of artistic license for how the characters were arranged. 


So think about this, even when the symbols were being used to represent phonetic sounds and put together to represent spoken words (left-brained), their visual connection to certain concepts (right-brained) could not be lost. An eye looks like an eye, even if it is being used as a letter. Am👁r👁te? 

 Steele of Mennahkt, c. 1321 B.C. - Wikimedia


While the evolved scripts we have today maybe allow for greater amounts of logical precision and ease of writing, they accomplish this by sacrificing a certain depth of meaning and a more expansive intuitive type of transference of information and ideas. 

The ability to decipher Egyptian hieroglyphs was lost for much of modern history, from the late 4th century A.D., until the (fortunate) discovery of the Rosetta Stone in 1799 A.D., which eventually enabled for its possible reconstruction (. . . or at least that's the popular story, maybe other people figured it out sooner or kept the knowledge alive in secret 🤷‍♀️). Those who pondered the carvings during those years did not understand its phonetic complexity. 
It is arguable whether the ancient Greeks or Romans understood hieroglyphics. The Greeks almost certainly did not, since from their viewpoint, hieroglyphics were not phonetic signs but symbols of a more abstruse and allegorical nature. The humanist revival of the European Middle Age, although it produced a set of Italian-designed hieroglyphics, gave no further insight into the original Egyptian. https://www.britannica.com/topic/hieroglyph
Which is kind of a strange development considering many of the most renowned Greek philosophers, studied at Egyptian mystery schools. However, it is also not strange given that certain ideas taken from the Egyptians were probably not appreciated, or were considered to be threatening by the powers that were. It is an interesting question as to how much of a factor this was. Certain people suggest that persecution was present.
It is clear then that Socrates offended the Athenian government simply because he pursued the study of astronomy and probably that of geology; and that the other philosophers were persecuted for the same reason. But the study of science was a required condition to membership in the Egyptian Mystery Systems, and its purpose was the liberation of the Soul from the ten bodily fetters, and if the Greek philosophers studied the sciences, then they were fulfilling a required condition to membership in the Egyptian Mystery System. Stolen Legacy, by George G. M. James[1954], ch.3 http://www.sacred-texts.com/afr/stle/stle07.htm

The Death of Socrates, by Jacques-Louis David(1787)


It is also the case that the reign of the pharaohs came to an end in 30 BC which would have contributed to the loss of the Egyptian priesthood and customs.  
The final straw, however, came when Cleopatra lost to Rome in the battle of Actium in 30BC. She was Egypt's last pharaoh and Egypt became a mere province of Rome.   
The use of hieroglyphics struggled on for several centuries, but it dwindled away to be replaced by the  Roman alphabet. Eventually, it fell into complete disuse and became a total mystery to humans. https://www.egyptabout.com/2017/01/when-did-hieroglyphics-stop.html
 And,
After the Emperor Theodsius I ordered the closure of all pagan temples throughout the Roman empire in the late 4th century AD, knowledge of the hieroglyphic script was lost https://www.omniglot.com/writing/egyptian.htm

So, it was not necessarily a complete accident, even if it was just through lack of respect for the wisdom of ancient Egypt (and unfortunate happenings such as the burning of the Library of Alexandria in Egypt in 48 BC), that the understanding of hieroglyphic writing was lost . . . for a time.

Luckily artifacts from the past are recovered through archeological study and other fortunate discoveries from time to time, and attempts to rewrite history are not always entirely successful. 

This same sort of thing occured with the Mayan codices in Mesoamerica. Only a few codices were saved from destruction, and then turned up in Europe, such as the Dresden Codex. 

The Mayans had a pictorial script as well. 

Mayan Codex written on Mesoamerican bark paper.

Their books were intentionally destroyed by the conquering Spanish, the biggest offender, Diego de Landa Caldéron, Catholic bishop of the Archdioceses of Yucatán. This was done in order to erase their history, and body of “heretical” knowledge and practices, in an attempt to control and change the story, and affect the future. 

Mural by Juan O’Gorman, Biblioteca Central de la UNAM, Mexico City 
We found a large number of books in these characters and, as they contained nothing in which were not to be seen as superstition and lies of the devil, we burned them all, which they (the Maya) regretted to an amazing degree, and which caused them much affliction. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diego_de_Landa - Clendinnen
Oh how odd, who would have thought? 🤨 🙄

People attempt to change history by limiting or changing what we see. The word history comes from Old French estoire "story; chronicle, history," from Latin historia "narrative of past events, account, tale, story," from Greek historia "a learning or knowing by inquiry, an account of one's inquiries, history, record, narrative," from historein "inquire," from histōr “wise man, judge,” from PIE *wid-tor-, from root *weid- to see.” [OE] 

So the word "history" can be traced back to the concept of the things seen and related by those wise and discerning. The seers (wid-tor-ians) of the things, tell the tales, or spell the spells. The most honest of these weid-tors (seers) being weeders of false history, but not weeders of information. It is against the spirit of inquiry (historia) to destroy people's histories. The most deceptive of the histōrs (wise men) are hissers (snakes) who use their spells in attempts to rewrite, or confuse history, and enslave the masses.

Snake in the Grass, Dr. Seuss Political Cartoon, March 24,1942

If writing is from the gods then it is no surprise that these things would resurface despite the best efforts of men to wipe them out.
Things once forbidden pop up time and again miraculously, like also, the Nag Hammadi library, a collection of of early Christian and Gnostic texts dating from the 2nd to 4th centuries AD, that were discovered in Upper Egypt in 1945. However, many of texts, found were significantly damaged and have missing words and sections.  

The ancient Egyptians themselves were not innocent of rewriting, or leaving out information in their histories as well. After the death of the heretic Pharaoh Akhenaten, monuments were dismantled, or hidden, and statues destroyed, and his name was even excluded from the king lists. 
These lists were often condensed, with some rulers (such as the contentious and disruptive Akhenaten, and even entire dynasties omitted from the record; they are not truly history, rather they are a form of ancestor worship, a celebration of the consistency of kingship of which the current ruler was a part. https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ap-art-history/ancient-mediterranean-ap/ancient-egypt-ap/a/ancient-egypt-an-introduction
The ancient Egyptians were so serious about their carvings and the power of the written word that they placed names inside of protective shen rings. The shen ring was a stylized loop of a rope. Shen meaning "encircle", and it represented eternal protection.

Shen

Cartouche, from French cartouche "a full charge for a pistol" (originally wrapped in paper thus resembling the shape of the cartouche), is the name given to these oblong shen rings that enclose names. 

Why should the name be treated this way? Perhaps because writing is a form of magic, or a magical formula, and it’s not wise to just write a name, spell it, put it out there unprotected. Names have power. A name defines a person. When a name is wrapped in the shen it is a name defined, loaded and locked for protection

Cartouche of Ramses II at Tanis, 3655 BC

There is a tradition of the names of gods /the divine, and /or demons not being named, or their names not being spoken, and also of knowers of names having certain powers over others [The Name of Ra]. Words are spells. Sometimes the spell is broken by not spelling it out even though it is known who is being referred to. Such as in the Old Testament The Name of God is written with the letters Yōd Hē Vov Hē, YHVH, or YHWH, But we don’t have the pronunciation, it was lost from history by the 3rd century BC. It is often assumed to be Yahweh, but is usually translated as The LORD, i.e., Adonai. And sometimes, simply, HaShem "The Name"(Interesting how in ancient Egypt names were written in shen rings, and as a hieroglyph were used for the word "name", and in Hebrew shem means name).

There is the idea that there are certain dangers, problems or powers associated with the writing and speaking of names. So, in both the spelling (writing out), and spelling (telling) of names. Perhaps this is due, in part, to the fact that what proceeds out of a person’s mouth, or how they read a word imposes their subjective understanding upon that person or concept. So it could be disrespectful for a uneducated or unenlightened individual to dare to define a divine being. They would be imposing their own history / herstory. Or, who would want to accidentally summon a demon by speaking its name? How dare a mere mortal speak The Name? Who knows if they are a good speller? 
Rabbinical Judaism teaches that the name [Yōd Hē Vov Hē] is forbidden to all except the High Priest, who should only speak it in the Holy of Holies of the Temple in Jerusalem on Yom Kippur. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_God_in_Judaism#YHWH
If anyone is a good speller it is the God of the universe, the most powerful magician of all. Magician is ultimately from Old Persian magush, which is possibly from PIE *mahg- "to be able; have power,"

The effectiveness of spell is based upon the powers of the magician. There is the magic of an illusionist, black magic, white magic, supernatural magic, alchemical magic, etc. However the proof is in the results. Without ability that produces real results, the "magician" is only a charlatan, i.e., a babbler, a quack. Just like a god that doesn’t produce any actual results is an idol due to this idleness, i.e., idol-ness.

The God of the universe was not idle. A most powerful spell was spoken and the whole of creation came into being, the One thingWordLogosOmTao. Ma'at. Asha . . .

Painting by Catherine O. / photo Julie O. / chthonickore


The rest is history.