Wednesday, February 19, 2020

Everyday Gray

Modern pewter is a gray alloy [a metal made by combining two or more metallic elements] of 85-99% tin mixed with approximately 5-10% antimony, 2% copper, bismuth, and sometimes silver. Ancient pewter, however, was a combination of approximately 70% tin and 30% lead. 

The word pewter is from Old French peautre, from Vulgar Latin peltrum, source of Spanish peltre, Italian peltro, being of unknown origin according to the online etymology dictionary [OE].


Pewter Plate on Pewter Background

Coming from the Latin peltrum, however, it seems reasonable that "pewter" could be connected to the PIE ([reconstructed]Proto-Indo-European) root *pel-(1) "pale". Pewter is a pale (gray) color. It does not tarnish but it can get dull over time, and the word pale, itself, comes from PIE root *pel-(1) "pale".

Metals are, in fact, sometimes named for their appearance / color. 


Silver for example is the "shining" or "white" metal. The abbreviation for silver is Ag, from Latin argentum, silver, silver work, silver money. Argentum is from PIE *arg- "to shine; white". 

If it is true that pewter is named after being pale in color, then it is similar to silver being named after its white / shiny appearance.

The English word lead is from Old English lead "lead, leaden vessel", from the Proto-Germanic *lauda- "lead," the origin of which is not agreed upon. 

However, one hypothesis is that it is borrowed from Proto-Celtic *øloud-io- ('lead'), which, if so, is related to the Latin plumbum. And, *øloud-io- is thought to be the origin of the Proto-Germanic *bliwa- (also meaning) "lead," which stemmed the German Blei "lead," which is further interesting given that the German word for the color blue is similar Blau "blue." And lead is sometimes described as a bluish metal. 


Blue Sky, El Escorpíon Park, CA, May 20, 2019, photo by Julie O. /chthonickore

The English adjective blue,
"of the color of the sky," c. 1300, bleu, blwe, etc. "sky-colored," also "livid, lead-colored," from Old French blo, bleu "pale, pallid, wan, light-colored; blond; discolored; blue, blue-gray," from Frankish *blao or some other Germanic source, from Proto-Germanic *blæwaz . . . [OE]
Ultimately from PIE *bhel (1) "to shine".

So it seems possible that the name for the metal lead could be connected to its pale appearance, especially given that in other languages lead seems also to also be named after its appearance. 

In biblical Hebrew, for example, lead is ophereth, from from aphar "dry earth, dust; ashes, dirt, earth, rubble, plaster, ground, mortar". So, might lead be named from its dusty or ashen (pale gray) color? Or if not, perhaps it is named for one of its states / appearances during the ore refining process, namely, a powder or paste.



    Lead - Pb - Plumbum Nigrum / Black Lead

Ancient pewter was made from tin and lead, and the two, both tin and lead, were both called the same, plumbum, by the Romans. The Romans called lead plumbum nigrum, i.e., black lead, and tin was called plumbum candidum / album, i.e. white lead. In this case the meaning of lead as "pale", i.e. gray, gray-blue" makes sense; there is the dark gray " black lead," and the light gray "white lead," but only one of these we now call lead in English. 

Historically metals were not always properly understood and identified, which lead to some confusion about the naming of metals. Lead itself is bright (white) like tin when cut but tarnishes quickly, and it is often found mixed with other metals and then separated from these lead-bearing ores, such as from Galena, which is an important source of silver. The original usage of the Latin word for "tin," stannum, actually referred to a mixture of silver and lead rather than tin.


Tin - Plumbum Album/White Lead

And of course graphite (another "pale" substance, which is actually not a metal, but a form of carbon) was mistaken as being a form of black lead and called plumbago, derived from plumbum (lead). It is because of this confusion that modern graphite pencils are called "lead" pencils, when they do not contain lead.

Pewter is similar in its color to both tin and lead. Below are some examples of pewter, lead, and tin paint samples. There are many more tints/shades named after each metal, however, they are all just varying shades of gray.


Paint Color Samples 

The name of these metals are sometimes used as adjectives and are synonyms for gray, as with the paint colors, when they are referring to varying shades of gray. These colors are not made out of pewter, lead, or tin but just resemble the look of the metals. So, a person could say, "The wall is pewter," and mean that it is gray, and not mean it is made out of the metal pewter. 

In Greek pelios is "livid (dark bluish gray [i.e., leaden] in color), dark," and polios is "gray"(as in of hair, wolves, waves), from PIE *pel- (1). So here again we see this root [*pel-(1)] sometimes related to the appearance of gray things and lead. It is also related to the appearance(color) of animals such as wolves and pigeons. Pigeon in fact, in Greek is peleia, pigeons being shades of gray, not unlike pewter. 



     Wolf Gray Textile

Pewter can also be related to another meaning of the PIE root (*pel-), namely, *pel- (3) "hide, skin." Wolves often have a pale or gray coat / pelt of varying shades, from white to dark gray, which could be said to be their "skin"(and their appearance). Pelt is a "skin of a fur-bearing animal," from *pel- (3) "hide, skin". Many types of pelts (from*pel-[3]) of animals are pale (from*pel-[1]) in color. The pelts of wolves are pale polios (gray), and even sometimes more pelios (dark or livid).

Magical Beasts Pop-Up, Illustration Anne Sharp(2003), photo by Julie O.

In Canto I of Dante's Inferno (begun c. 1308, completed in 1320) there is a description of three beasts guarding the way to the "shining Mount of Joy". The third beast is a She-Wolf,
 . . . And down his track, a She-Wolf drove upon me, a starved horror
ravening and wasted beyond all belief. She seemed a rack for avarice
[*tutte brame], gaunt and craving. 
Oh many the souls she has brought to endless grief! – Canto I, 50, John Ciardi 
Dante Running from the Three Beasts,1824-7, William Blake

Next we are told of the hound who will come and hunt down this wolf. The Italian text is,
Questi non ciberà terra né peltro, ma sapïenza, amore e virtute, e sua nazion sará tra feltro e feltro. – Canto I, II. 103-104
Peltro in Italian is "pewter". This phrase is somewhat enigmatic, and is translated in various ways putting different interpretations upon the word peltro.

In this English translation below, the Italian peltro is translated literally in order to keep in the style of Dante's rhyme, i.e., terza rema, "third rhyme". In English "pewter" does not rhyme with Fletro, as peltro does with feltro in Italian, so the word order is changed to rhyme "ground" with "abound" instead.
His food shall be not pewter, nor the ground . . . where either Feltro sets abound . . . – Translation in the tera rema of the original, by W.E. Painter, (1843)
The hound will not feed on pewter, nor the ground? What does that mean even? 

In some English translations license it taken with the rendering of peltro / pewter, as perhaps was the intent of the original. In this translation from Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, peltro/pewter is translated as "pelf", pelf meaning "money, especially when gained in a dishonest or dishonorable way".
He shall not feed on either earth or pelf, But upon wisdom, and love and virtue; 'Twix Feltro and Feltro shall his nation be; – Canto I, (1867)
And here, in the John Ciardi translation peltro is "loot",
. . . before the Greyhound comes to hunt her down.  He will not feed on lands nor loot, but honor
and love and wisdom will make straight his way.  He will rise between Feltro and Feltro, and in him
  shall be the resurrection and new day. – Canto I, stanza 95, (1954)
Ciardi's translation of the description of the wolf as "a wrack for avarice," avarice meaning "extreme greed for wealth or material gain," in the previous stanza [mentioned above] seems to support this translation of "loot", however, the word choice is, rather, a choice than a true translation of brame "craving, desire, lust, hunger," whereas avarizia "avarice" is not the word used in the Italian text.
Ed una lupa, che di tutte brame sembiava carca ne la sua magrezza ...
Therefore, this description does not necessarily point to greed for wealth specifically, but perhaps just ravenous hunger, or intemperate behavior in general. 

Earth, ground and land are all meanings of the Italian terra. This last translation of "lands and loot" seems to steer the meaning of what the hound shuns in favor of more honorable or spiritual fare, toward the sense of acquisitions and power, such as gained by conquering. So, "loot and lands" as fare, seem to points to a vice such as avarice specifically.


Roman Hunter, Dusan Markovic(2018), Deviant Art

It could be assumed that the word "pelf" and "loot" are used in the place of "pewter" because of the fact that money is made from metals, and pewter is a metal. So the assumption would be that Dante used the word peltro loosely to mean pelf/loot just because it rhymes with feltro, and not necessarily because it was the most appropriate word to use. 

As far as I know, the word peltro is not commonly meant to mean pelf or loot. And, the word pewter in English itself is not a common way to refer to money/coinage, even if the name of other metals are used in this way.

A common coin used during the Middle Ages was a small silver penny (pfennig) or denarius. Other metals in use for coinage during the Middle Ages were gold and copper. 



Silver denarius, dating to the year 77 BC, depicting the goddess Roma and the she-wolf(Crawford 388/1b)


I'n not certain that pewter specifically was used for any coinage in the early 1300's, when the Inferno was written. Pewter is not commonly used to make money. There is an instance of pewter, copper, and brass coins, known as "gun money"  being made by the forces of James II during the Williamite war in Ireland between 1689 and 1691. However they were designed to be redeemed for silver after the end of the war.

Silver can be used as a word to mean "money", as in silver coin, a person can be paid in silver(coin). However, the question is whether peltro (pewter) was meant to be used in this way to mean "money".

According to the etymology dictionary pelf (n.) is from mid-14c., "stolen goods," from Anglo-French pelf, Old French pelfre "booty, spoils"(11c.), of unknown origin. Its meaning as "money, riches," with pejorative overtone first recorded c. 1500. So it would be a more modern interpretation of the word "pelf" to mean "money" particularly rather than the more general "loot"(which is valuables as well as money). And it may not be the case that the word pelf evolved from some connection with the metal peltro (pewter) just because they both begin with -pel, even if this seems compelling, and a reason to use the word "pelf" specifically. 

The origin of pelf is said to be unknown, but is suggested as being possibly related to pilfer. In that case, if true, pelf would originate from the root *pil- rather than *pel-. And this his makes sense when looking at the connection of the meaning of pelf to the definition of other "pil-" words such as pilfer and pillage. Pilfer(v.), for example, from 1540s, is from the Old French pelfre(n.) "spoils, boody" as well. Both "pelf" and "pilfer", being from pelfre, are said to be of unknown origin. 

However pillage, from late 14 c., which is similar in meaning to pilfer, is from Old French pilage "to plunder, loot, ill-treat, is possibly from Vulgar Latin *pilliare "to plunder," said to be probably from a figurative use of Latin pilare "to strip of hair." So if pillage is connected to the Latin word pilus (plural pili) "hair," we might connect pillage to the notion of pile "things heaped up", or "a mound," this idea coming from what is commonly done to pili "hair." Pili is piled on top of the head. And also, sadly, pili (the hair), with the scalp attached can be pillaged from a person's head.



Smaug (and his loot). Illustration by Livia Ruzz for the 1975 Romanian edition, The Hobbit

The point of this whole consideration being that word pelf would not be  etymologically connected to the Italian word peltro (pewter). And then, therefore, if this word, pelf, was chosen to translate the word peltro, it would have to do with the fact that pewter is a metal of value [it did in fact have high value during the Middle Ages], which might be considered "loot." But this loot, i.e., pewter (if meant to mean loot), would 1.) not necessarily have the connotation of "money" as such, rather just the notion of being of value. And 2.) peltro/pewter would not etymologically be related to the word pelf "loot." Pelf would rather have to do with piles of pilfered goods. 

It seems like the sense of pewter, if used to mean pewter "the metal," was not referring to pewter coins, necessarily, but rather as a synonym for articles of value (probably stolen), as in, loot. So the question would be, was the word peltro, as in "the metal" pewter, used in the 14 c./ or meant to be used in this case by Dante, as a synonym for loot? Furthermore, is the translation of "earth and pelf,"or "lands and loot" [being things which are presumably figuratively eaten], a meaningful/fitting juxtaposition to "wisdom, love and virtue (virtute)"? Is loot/spoils/pelf something that is figuratively said to be fed upon? And was the word peltro meant to mean something of great value, or was it actually the opposite, meaning something base or common?

Before answering that question further. I'd like to entertain a different possible hypothesis.


Might the word peltro possibly be calling to mind something pale or gray ("pewter" adj.) and maybe earthy, or not of particular excellence? The gray is mundane, it's not exciting like the colors of a rainbow. It's not that there is anything wrong with earth, or gray, but they aren't particularly thrilling or elevated fare either. So rather than being vicious, they are, rather, just base. Gray is unexciting. And the earth/ground is itself literally base, being the thing we stand on below the heavens. Creatures are made from the earth and that is meant to be humbling.
Then the LORD God formed a man from the dust [aphar] of the ground [adamah] and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man [ha adam] became a living being. Genesis 2:7, NIV 
Light Sculpture, by Paige Bradley

Yet, it came to pass that the adam (pl.) would be cast out of the garden from whence they came.
By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food until you return to the ground [ha adamah], since from it you were taken; for dust [aphar] you are and to dust [aphar] you will return. Genesis 3:19

"Migrant agricultural workers", Dorothea Lang, Nipomo, California, March 1936

Remember aphar in Hebrew is "dry earth, dust; ashes, dirt, earth, rubble, plaster, ground, mortar," and the word ophereth "lead" comes from this. Lead, which is another gray metal is a component of ancient pewter.

If you are what you eat, then eating earth points to being made of, or being of, the earth, and having earthly concerns and thoughts, and maybe not caring to endeavor to rise above this base nature, unlike the person who feeds off of wisdom, love and virtue. 


Sheaves of Wheat, Pslams of Joy, The Children's Bible, 1965, photo by Julie O.

Even eating what is grown or produced out of the earth, let alone dirt, such as, wheat/bread is still base to a certain extent because it feeds the body. Jesus talks of having food (and therefore eating of it) which is more spiritual in nature.
Meanwhile his disciples urged him, "Rabbi, eat something." But he said to them, "I have food to eat that you know nothing about."  John 4:31-32
and what was this food that he had? 
Then his disciples said to each other, "Could someone have brought him food?" John 4:33, NIV
No, 
"My food," said Jesus, "is to do the will of him who sent me and finish his work. . . John 4:34

And again, as Jesus said to the tempter in the desert,
"It is written: 'Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.'" Matthew 4:4, NIV
Temptation of Christ, Vasily Surikov, 1872

This meaning of peltro, as being something gray and of the earth, would seem to fit with the sense of the rendering of "terra né peltro" in a translation by Robert Pensky. He combines terra (earth) and peltro (pewter) into the single concept of "earthly fare." Earthly fare alludes to that which is common or base, as opposed what is virtuous and worthy. And thus it carries a negative connotation, as with the serpent in Genesis who was cursed to eat, or feed off of dust. 
So the LORD God said to the serpent,"Because you have done this, "Cursed are you above all livestock and all wild animals! You will crawl on your belly and you will eat dust [aphar] all the days of your life.  Genesis 3:14, NIV
The Children's Bible[inside cover detail], 1965, photo by Julie O.

So, is the hound possibly feeding off of wisdom, love and virtue as opposed to this earthly fare? Perhaps not feading off of earth (adamah) or dust (aphar), as an allusion to the creation story?

Intriguingly, it is not even a completely outlandish to say that an animal would eat earth and dust. In fact, some animals do eat dirt, even clay specifically. This practice is called geophagia (earth + eat). Geophagia was first described by Galen, the Greek philosopher / physician in the second century AD. He recorded how certain sick or injured animals ingest clay. It is a practice found in the human animal population as well.
In the south it was and still is a common practice. "I remember my mom and my aunties eating that white dirt like it was nothing," says Hilmam, who grew up in Greene County, Ga., and used to go with her family to dig for their own dirt to snack on. "It was an acceptable thing that people did."
"White dirt" is actually a soft, chalky clay called kaolin and is widely used to make porcelain, paper and paint. The mineral kaolinite is one of the most common in the world, and best-known deposits are located in the southeastern U.S. NPR, The Old and Mysterious Practice of Eating Dirt

Clay is a type of earth that is sometimes gray (or white, brown, orange-red). Clay is pale. Clay is gray earth. at times it named after its dusty or pale color as some metals are. 


     Gray / Pewter(colored) Clay

Argil is clay, and especially a white clay used by potters.

Argilla is "clay, argil" in Italian, which comes from the same root as argento "silver", and argent, i.e. *arg-. So in this case clay (argil) and a metal (argent/silver) are named from the same word. Clay can have a silvery color as well as, or like, the metal silver. 


White Kaolin Clay Powder

Clay can also be named or described by its pale appearance, as some metals are.

It is interesting that a word for clay in Greek is pélos "clay, mud, slime, pug" in Greek. Does this have to do with the fact that it is sometimes pelios (livid; dark) or polios (gray)? This word is used in this passage from the Gospels when Jesus makes clay to use in a healing of a blind man. 
When he had said this, He spat on the ground, and made clay [pelon πηλòν, from pélos "clay, mud ('wet clay')] of the spittle, and applied the clay to his eyes. John 9:6 NASB
Jesus Heals a Blind Man

So the man was humble to have this mud spread on his eyes, and had to act in faith to go and wash in the Pool of Siloam instead of telling Jesus, "no thanks," and not submitting to this weird procedure that had no assurance of working. How many people are "blind" but will not be humble and submit to wisdom, love, and virtue in order to be healed of their blindness?  . . . Not accepting that they are dust. . . YET that they are worthy of being raised above their earthy nature? 

If clay (argil), especially white clay, is named from the same base as silver (argent), *arg-(to shine, white), then it doesn't seem impossible that other names for clay might come from clay's pale appearance, such as pélos (clay) with the PIE root *pel (1) "pale," embedded in the word itself. 

Therefore might peltros used poetically in Canto I possibly be referring to a kind of earth that is pale or peltros(adj.), or, clay? In this way peltros would be juxtaposed to terro, as things of the earth, or types of earth.
He shall not feed on either earth or clay, But upon wisdom, and love and virtue. . .
But, why not use argilla "clay" in the stanza if it was meant to mean clay? This would be for the same reason the word for silver (argento) would not have been used if pewter (peltro) was referring to money/pelf/loot. Neither argilla (clay) nor argento (silver) rhyme with feltro. But in the same way that peltro might be used poetically to refer to loot, might not peltro also bring to mind the idea of clay? Clay being both white and/or pale? So was the word peltro (pewter) used to mean something like clay or dust due to the fact that peltro rhymes with feltro at the end of the stanza?
Questi non ciberà terra né peltro, ma sapïenza, amore e virtute, e sua nazion sará tra feltro e feltro. —Canto I, II. 103-104

It is fascinating that under this hypothesis, i.e.,  peltrum referring to clay or dust, that a Hebrew word for "clay" is tin (phonetic teen), also meaning "common." NAS Concordance says this is from (Aramaic) perhaps corresponding to tit "mud, mire, clay." So here a word which in English means the metal tin, in Hebrew, a similar sounding word means "clay." And clay can be tin, lead, or pewter colored. So literally clay(n.) is tin(adj.), and tin is "clay". Furthermore, pewter is similar in color to plumbum (lead and tin), so pewter(n.) is tin(adj.), and tin(n.) is pewter(adj.) as well. Therefore in this sense we can say clay is pewter. 

Tin, also, somehow inherited in its name the idea of something less pure than it actually is. Tin is an element designated Sn, from Latin stannum, and is not an alloy of various metals. However, before the sixth century stannum referred to a mixture of silver and lead rather than tin.
. . . the ancients obtained, as we do, a great deal of lead from argentiferous ores, from which they separated the silver and revived the lead. The ore was pounded very fine, or, as we say, stamped; it was then washed and roasted, and formed into  a powder or paste. This was then put in a furnace, and by the first fusion gave a regulous consisting of silver and lead, which was called stannum, and was the same substance as that known to our metallurgists by the name of werk.  The History of Inventions and Discoveries, Volume 4, by Johann Beckmann, p. 9
Eventually, however, this word, stannum, came to refer to tin, and in modern usage replaced the name plumbum candidum (white lead). The etymology dictionary says that stannum is a scribal alteration of Latin stagnum, which is also the source of the Italian stagno, French étain, Spanish estaño. So we can see from the French and Spanish rendering how the English word "tin" is related to stannum in sound even though it is not immediately obvious. And also how this Latin word stannum/stagnum (and Italian stagno) is similar to Latin stagnantem (nominative stagnans) "to stagnate," which is not an especially flattering connection.

Tin is something that needs to be extracted, generally, from ore. A chief source of tin is cassiterite. Tin is extracted by a process that involves smelting (which is extracting [metal] from its ore by a process involving heating and melting). 


     Smelting ore

Tin is a very soft metal, but is an important element when used in combination with other metals, such as copper in the making of Phosphor Bronze (an alloy), which is actually stronger and less corrosive than copper alone. An alloy is "a metal made by combining two or more metallic elements, especially to give greater strength or resistance to corrosion." So, perhaps it is because of this process that tin is related to stannum.
In Hebrew the name for tin also carries some negative connotation. Tin is bedil " alloy, tin, dross" in Hebrew, from badal "to be divided, separate," (therefore not unlike the process of smelting). So it is more of a generic name, but actually, the bedil of the bible, referred to an alloy.
The Tin of the bible ([kassiteros] in the Greek version) corresponds to the Hebrew [bedil], which is really a Copper alloy known as early as 1600 BC in Egypt.  Stannum Tin, Elementemology & Elements Multidict, elements, vanderkrogt.org
and in Isaiah this bedil is figurative of evil of Jerusalem [Brow-Driver-Briggs concordance]
I will turn my hand against you; I will thoroughly purge away your dross and remove your impurities [bedil]. Isaiah 1:25 NIV
Also,
When I turn my attention to you, I'll refine your dross as in a furnace. I'll remove all your alloy [bedilayik, from bedil]. Isahah 1:25 ISV, Hebrew
So this word bedil, originally referring to an alloy of copper in Hebrew, eventually became the word used for "tin." And, tin, although not an alloy itself, is often used in the making different alloys. Pewter, on the other hand, is an alloy (of tin). And In Greek there is just one word referring to both tin and pewter.

Kassíteros in Greek is "tin," but also the adjective "pewter", the name having to do with a region where tin is mined, rather than a name deriving from its appearance. Pewter(n.) is kráma kassíterou, from kráma (alloy) + kassíteros (tin) is pewter(n.). So pewter is "alloy of tin" in Greek. Given these things, there is some argument for saying pewter, as an alloy of tin, carries with it some of the same etymological baggage as tin does, such as "dross." Not to say that tin or pewter are in fact "worthless," but they aren't considered the most noble of the metals (such as gold, silver and platinum).

So, where does this leave us in our consideration of the rendering of peltro into English in Canto I of Dante's Inferno? 

If left simply as "pewter," it is curious to the reader. Eating earth is one thing, but eating metal is another. It's not really possible for a hound to eat metal [However, there was some debate during the Middle Ages as to whether or not ostriches ate and/or digested iron. Midieval Animal Data-Network, Fact Checking:Can Ostriches Digest Iron?]

Shattered Teeth, Tom & Jerry

It is obviously meant to be taken figuratively. 

Given this, there are two meanings of pewter: 1.) pewter is a noun meaning a certain type of metal, and 2.) it is an adjective which refers to a gray color. And "pewter," as an adjective could perhaps then be meant to refer back to a noun (possibly dirt/clay) of the same color. 

Pewter if taken as a metal, and figuratively interpreted as "loot" or "pelf," has the meaning of riches (perhaps stolen goods). However, if peltro instead means something pale, like clay, the sense of the phrase terra né peltro translated as "earthen fare," figuratively means what is base, rather than meaning specifically lust or greed, and the word peltro is not directly translated.

Whatever Dante intended to mean by this word, peltro, we know that it, along with terra, is contrasted to wisdom, love, and virtue (which are themselves only figuratively eaten as well). An interpretation, such as proposed in this post, that peltro might allude to dust or clay (which may not be as much of a stretch in Italian as it is in English) offers a general and fitting contrast to the more noble fare of wisdom, love and virtue, and also nicely alludes to classic biblical themes, such as the snake in the garden, who bit the dust. 

The hound, however, was not another one who bites the dust . . . perhaps . . . 

But the answer doesn't seem to be black and white, rather, more shady, maybe even an everyday gray.


Albero di terra e peltro, Black and White Edit, art by Ailis O'Reilly


Albero dell'amore a colori, Original art by Ailis O'Reilly







Sunday, December 22, 2019

Tyet Knot


    Tyet, Amulet, Ancient Egyptian Faience, Amarna

There is some mystery surrounding the origin and meaning of the ancient Egyptian tyet symbol, according to egyptologists. The meaning of the hieroglyph is rendered as "welfare" and "life". Sometimes it is called "the Knot / Buckle / Girdle of Isis," and it indeed looks like a looped and knotted piece of cloth. The arms of the tyet, rather than extending outward like the similar ankh (also with meaning “life”), hang down the sides in a rather relaxed fashion, as a ribbon tied in a long looping bow might do. Definitely very feminine and yin looking in nature. 

The Tyet looks like a draping garment which is reminiscent of the feminine form. Tyets ("life") are feminine in nature. Just as the woman in the garden of Eden was called Eve / Chavvah / Havva ("life").


Red Carnelian Tit / Tyet (Isis knot) amulet, ca. 1550-1275 BCE, The Met

Since the tyet was associated with the goddess and in the later kingdoms with Isis, we have a clue as to in what sense "life" is meant. The feminine association with "life" is the earth goddess, Eve, abundance and bringing forth of life from the fertile earth / ground / adamah*, Gaia, blood, and and life from the womb. 

*"ground / dust / earth / soil," from Hb., adom "to be red"; same as adam; dam "blood"; the creature God made in his own image and likeness was made from the red/blood, i.e., fertile soil.

The Empress, Shaddowscapes tarot, pregnancy, fertility, motherhood, sensuality, nurturing, femininity, nature harmony, art

The symbol is also sometimes connected to or called "the blood of Isis." Some say that the tyet may have been a representation of some sort of menstrual cloth because of its association with red carnelian (dSr "red" in ancient Egyptian similar to dSrw "blood"), menstruation, and usage as protective amulet for pregnancy, but I don't personally think this fits with its origins. If the tyet is associated with fertility and life, and menstruation/pregnancy are also associated with fertility and life, then it is reasonable that the two would be associated. This does not mean that the tyet was originally supposed to be a representation of a menstrual cloth, or even a yoni or womb. I'm more inclined to think that the reference to blood has to do with blood's association with "life" and bringing forth of, and sustaining of life (wellfare). 

Isis was a goddess who was responsible for the resurrection of her husband Osiris (god of fertility, agriculture, the dead, resurrection, life*). Isis along with her sister, Nephtys gathered together the missing and scattered pieces of Osiris' dismembered body. Osiris was then resurrected long enough for Isis to become pregnant with Osiris' son, Horus. Osiris is often associated with and even depicted as the Djed pillar. The djed and tyet are often seen together in artwork. 


[*so similar associations as the earth goddesses, such as Demeter / Ceres, the mother earth goddess, goddess of agriculture, grain, crops, fertility, and her daughter Persephone / Proserpina "Queen of the Underworld/Dead.]

 
Detail of the upper margin of the sarcophagus of the last native Egyptian pharaoh  Nectanebo II (30th dynasty reign, c. 360-343 BCE)

The Djed / Tet pillar was used as a hieroglyph for the spoken word, as well as a symbol and concept in and of itself, it had the meaning "stability, continuity, regeneration". It is commonly said to represent the backbone of Osiris. It is an enigmatic symbol in origin, like the Tyet. When discussing the meaning of the tyet and djed, it is important to note, that they are two of the more ancient of Egyptian symbols which remained popular throughout the duration of the ancient Egyptian culture. The origins of the tyet are much older than many of the representations, descriptions and usage that we have from the later time periods.
The Tjet [Tyet] is thought to date from the Predynastic period and was a popular decorative symbol by the third dynasty (Old Kingdom), often appearing alongside the Ankh and the Djed . . . By the New Kingdom it was associated with Isis perhaps due to to its frequent association with the Djed . . . Thus the Djed may have represented the masculine power, while the Tjet represented the feminine power. . . Ancient Egypt Online/Tjet(Tyet), ancientegyptonline.co.uk

Ancient Egypt was rich in symbolism. Not only was the language written with an hieroglyphic system that is pictorial, but the religious iconography and every day use of amulets contained copious amounts of archetypal information available to the unread masses as well as to the scholars. Here the saying was never more true, "A picture says a thousand words." Considering that hieroglyphic written language wasn't in usage until c. 3200 BC and the origin of the Tyet and Djed were sometime during the Predynastic period, the words tyet and djed were spoken words before they were written phonetically.

One idea regarding the origin of the word tjt [one common transliteration of Egyptian hieroglyphic word, or also t_t], known as tyet, could be that it might have originated as a form of the word dd, i.e., djed, but with the feminine ending -t. This is just some freeform speculation, but not without some logical basis.


The word for this so called "Knot of Isis" is rendered in English sometimes as tyet, tjet, tiet, tet, tit, tet, that, thet. I have seen it pronounced with a long I, as tie-et, or with a long E, as teet. Since we must transliterate and transcribe the ancient Egyptian hieroglyphic language, which was written without vowels, linguists only speculate as to how the words were pronounced. So we have many different spellings and pronunciations in English of the possible pronunciations of the ancient Egyptian words. Often in transcriptions from Egyptian hieroglyphs to English, either a t or a d are used to spell the same word, such as tuat or duat, meaning “underworld” depending on who is doing the translation and what system they are using. 

The name of the god Thoth, for example, is also sometimes written as Djehuti, Tehuti, Techu, Tetu, and has equally wildly varied pronunciations. And djed, the so called Pillar of Osiris, is sometimes written as tet. 

(Thoth and Horus supporting djed pillar) Mummy Case of Nespanetjerenpere [detail], 22nd- early 25th Dynasty, c. 945-712 BCE, Brooklyn Museum, NYC

This confusion arises because, not only do we not know how the words sounded when spoken by a person during this ancient period, when people try to pronounce even the same words, or try to translate words there is much variation in accent and vowel usage. . . you say tomato, I say tomato . . . And there are sounds made in certain languages that other languages do not have and are hard for non natives speakers to pronounce. . . So, for example, tell an English speaking person to write a word as they hear it spoken you will get different spellings. Is the Hebrew word written as, Eve (from the Greek) in English translations of the bible, Havvah / Hawwah, or Chavvah / Chawwah? And good luck if the person who is doing the translation speaks yet another language and hears the word third, forth or fifth hand. When trying to understand the story of history we are forever playing a vast game of "telephone" but with many more factors involved even, so, given the fact that the tyet is a very ancient symbol which may have been spoken before it was ever written, it is not surprising if something akin to djed-et, or tet-et, morphed into tyet or tit.

There are examples like this especially in the early dynasties, of male Egyptian deities having female counterparts with the same name feminized, such as Amun [jmn] / Amunet [jmnt], both meaning "the Hidden One". Nu / Naunet, meaning "primordial waters". Kekui / Kekuit, "primordial darkness". Allso the ancient Egyptian word for “wife, woman” is hmt, from hm “incarnation”, with the -t ending. This is interesting because hm is like the English pronoun for a male, "him", so woman, then, is him-et. This is also similar to the words male and female, man and woman, and as in the book of Genesis, from the Hebrew, is [ish] / issa [ishshah] "man/woman".
Then ha'adam (the man) said, "This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called issah (woman), because she was taken out of ish (man)." Genesis 2:23

The Djed had the meaning of stability, and with stability we have security, and security is welfare and life, that is, Tyet. 

Detail of the outermost golden shrine of Tutankhamun, 18th dynasty, Valley of the Kings. Egyptian Museum, Cairo

The Djed and Tyet were both often represented with similar pillar like trunks, and associated with the masculine (god / Osiris) and feminine (goddess / Isis) principles.

What if tyet was actually tet-et, but was then contracted by usage? This does happen sometimes, such as with the word "messenger" in English.
[messenger] With unetymological -n- inserted by c. 1300 for no apparent reason except that people liked to say it that way. . . [OE]

The Djed first appeared in the Predynastic period (c. 6000-3150 BC). It was thought to be made originally with stalks or sheaves of reeds. When grain or stalks are ready to be harvested, they are cut and tied, so my question is, "Did the tyet tie it? Did the tyet make the pillar tight?" Namely, were the stalks which made the djed / tet fastened by something which was then called tyet or tet-et? In this case the tyet securing the stalks under the heads is literally a neck tie/necktie [which is fitting considering that tyet amulets were usually placed on the neck of the deceased, therefore were neck tyets. Perhaps placed at the neck because the neck is where the spine/backbone connects with the head?]. In this way the Djed and Tyet would have been the cause of the stability of the pillar together.


    Sheaves of Reeds like Pillars

A knot/tie secures, and is for security. Single stalks alone are not stable like a pillar without being tied in bunches. In this way the union of the masculine and feminine, and the equal importance of each is apparent.

It is true that the two are not depicted as part of the same single structure in the images shown above (however, sometimes the Djed is depicted combined with the Ankh as below), but this doesn't necessarily mean that they were never used in rituals in this way, i.e., as some sort of combined djed/tyet pillar.

Isis and Nepthys with djed, ankh, sun disk, raised arms, from Book of the Dead of Ani, British Museum, London, facsimile 1890; original c. 1300 BCE


There is a long tradition of pillars being used in fertility rituals, often decorated / tied with ribbons / cloth, such as May Poles. We can not have fecudity without both the masculine and feminine present, and at some point joined.
Raising of the Maypole, similar to the raising of the Djed. Djed Adorned with Tyet?
In the Predynastic Period[*before it was even associated with Osiris] it [the djed] may have originally been a representation of a fertility pole upon which sheaves of grain were suspended at festivals. This pole may have been a feature of early fertility rituals which eventually came to be associated with the god who made the land fertile [*firstly Ptah, later assumed by Atum, Sokar and Osiris]. . . the Djed Pillar festival was held annually at which an actual djed pillar was built and raised by the local priesthood on the first day of the harvest season. Raising the pillar may have originally symbolized the grains raising from the earth, but in time came to represent the god Osiris returning from the dead. -Ancient History Encyclopedia https://www.ancient.eu/Djed/

The Djed, meaning “stability," is only stable (and not scattered like Osiris' body) because Isis “knit/tied" Osiris back together after he was killed. She was the cause of “life”, and of his “welfare". 

The tyet symbol was used as a funerary amulet to protect the deceased in the journey to the afterlife.
You possess your blood, Isis, you possess your power. Isis, you possess your magic, Isis. The amulet is protection for this Great One, which will drive off anyone who would perform a criminal act against him. - Spell 156, Book of the Dead
In this way it is fitting that the symbol[tyet] would be represented as separate from the backbone of the god, for they were in fact separated by death, and Osiris did not fare well until he was reunited by his wife and his welfare restored. So too, when one is in death the "life" represented by the tyet would offer support, and enable stability. 

This goddess figurine is from Predynastic Egypt (6000-3100 BC). Figurines such as this were often used as mortuary objects. Paleolithic goddess images are often depicted as mother goddess figurines, shown and pregnant, with full figures, or sometimes like this, with raised arms as in the example below.


Female Figurine, Predynastic Egypt (6000-3150 BCE), by Brooklyn Museum 

Here the goddess is tall and pillarlike. 

This pottery [below] is from the same time period. It depicts masculine and feminine looking figures atop (next to?) a reed boat (?) with pillar/ladder type structures. There are many examples of pottery from the period with these same motifs repeated. The raised pillar/ladder looking objects are a common feature. It isn't clear what they are depicting but perhaps it is possible they are depicting some sort of bound reed structure, so in that way similar to the djed. From the looks of the images on the pottery it seems possible that the symbolism may not have been completely separate from the notion of the djed pillar and the tyet.
 

Naqada II pottery, late predynastic period (3100-2950 BCE)

It doesn't appear that the goddess with raised arms statuettes were popularly produced after this period of time. However, during the period of the Ancient Egyptian Kingdoms, over the next few millennia, various goddesses, including Isis are portrayed with outstretched arms, donning feathered wings.

Seated Isis (her throne crown identifies her) with outstretched winged arms

One of the most intriguing mysteries of prehistoric Egypt is the transition from Paleolithic to Neolithic life, represented by the transformation from hunting and gathering to sedentary farming. We know very little about how and why this exchange occurred. Predynastic Period in Ancient Egypt, ancient.eu
Could there have been a shift over time, as the civilizations moved from the Paleolithic hunter gatherer societies to agricultural societies, in how this divine feminine counterpart was portrayed? As the civilizations of the Mediterranean shifted towards more patriarchal societies, as seen at the time of the ancient Greek civilization and the Roman Empire, the interpretations, representations, and roles of the goddesses would have been adapted or shifted to fit these ideologies over time, and this, not even necessarily consciously.

Here, in this depiction of the raising of the djed, Isis is seen assisting the pharaoh. She is depicted next to the pillar, like the tyet, rather than on top of it or as part of it. At the center is the djed pictured with the Double Plumed crown and sundisk of Amun-Re.


Ancient bass relief showing Pharaoh Seti I[1323-1279 BCE, 19th dynasty] raising the Djed column with Isis. West wall Osiris hall. Temple of Abydos, el Balyana, Egypt

The phallic / yonic attributes of the djed and tyet are also commonly pointed out along with the other symbolism, but this could be a secondary correspondence by nature of the objects. The djed and tyet as symbols are rich in meaning and importance even without any phallic consideration, as they represent the body of the god who dies and is then resurrected, and his wife. The djed is Osiris' backbone, not his boner. The two are by nature representative of the masculine/yang and the feminine / yin respectively (and by masculine and feminine is not meant gendered men and women. Each individual is an expression of both masculine and feminine principle even if engendered in a specific body polarity of male or female); the djed being: erect, hard/stable, straight, possessing copious seed (as stalks), and the tyet: relaxed and receptive looking with what could be considered yonic and womblike shapes. The loop itself is feminine in the sense that it is a hole which can be penetrated. 

However, if we are going to relate the symbols to their phallic meaning, it is powerful symbolism as well. The feminine is penetrated but not injured by the penetration (sexual act), and the feminine bleeds without a wound (menstruation / childbirth), this can be seen as a type of magic which the feminine possesses, whereas, when the masculine is penetrated and bleeds it is injured and dies. 

Christ Crucified (c. 1632) by Diego Valazquez. Museo del Prado, Madrid

When the feminine submits to the masculine it is seeded and able to produce new life. But in order for the masculine to be fruitful, it is necessary that it submits to a kind of death, or actual death.
Truly, truly, I say unto you, unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth (feminine) and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it bears much fruit. John 12:24 
It was only when the masculine, as the son of God, Jesus gave himself / submitted to the cross and died, that he then was raised to new life, and gave life to the world, in the form of being the cause for the resurrection of the many, enabled by their being transformed into and one with God, as the Egyptians trusted in resurrection remembering and identifying with the death and resurrection of Osiris. 

Thus, this submission of the masculine can be seen as a kind of blessing. It is a hard passageway, yet the result is new life / fruitfulness / movement. It is a pathway out of the frozeness of death and hell. Together the masculine and the feminine, in proper balance and union, create a ladder/pillar to heaven. 


It just so happens, however that it is more difficult for the masculine to submit than for the feminine, because the polarity of high is . . . low.
For a little while they are exalted, and then they are gone; they are brought low and gathered up like all others; they are cut off like heads of grain. Job 24:24
This is why it is said of wisdom,
. . . Compared with the light [masculine] she is found to be superior, for it is succeeded by the night, but against wisdom [feminine], evil does not prevail. Wisdom 7:29-30
This "superiority" seems to be in the sense that when there is movement of the yin / night it moves to light, which is generally pleasant and seen as the good, but when there is movement of the day / yang, it is overcome by the darkness of the cycle which is viewed as adversity or evil. But Jesus, as all men/women/humankind do, submitted to a mater (latin "mother') to be born in to matter (earth). And there is no doubt this is difficult. Yet the benefit we receive from this submission, i.e., being nailed to the wheel of the zodiac in birth, so to speak, is great. 


Even though it is easy for the feminine to be mistreated by abuse of power of the masculine, a woman rightfully possesses the sexual agency to either allow the masculine to penetrate the passage to the womb (place of the fertile blood) or not. She is the gatekeeper of this feminine power, and authority over this allowing of the masculine aspect to merge with the feminine. Thus the feminine is the gatekeeper of the masculine's power to create (without a fertile place to put the seed, no new life). With out this fertile earth, a place for the seed to fall, the masculine cannot have offspring physically/metaphorically/spiritually or otherwise. 


So what can we say when the masculine principle is stuck or not fruitful? Obviously it needs to work with the fertile territory of the feminine principle. This is especially true of logic (masculine) and intuition (feminine). When there is no answer, logic is stuck/not fruitful, then intuitive exploring is necessary to provide new and fertile ground to plant the seeds (ideas) of logic in and see what grows from them. Things become stagnant and stale, i.e., dead when the breath of life is withheld. This is an alchemical principle as well, the sacred marriage of the masculine and feminine elements. It is for this reason that the differences and dignity of these polarities need to be honored. Without them working together the world and everything in it physically and mentally dies, or is good as dead.


Hieronymous Bosch, The Garden of Earthly Delights[detail], 1490-1510, Museo del Prado, Madrid, Album Cover, Dead Can Dance, photo by Julie O.

The sexual manifestations of male and female are only physical representations of these complex concepts or realities. The All / God is the unity of the yin and yang. God is both masculine and feminine and thus creation reflects this. Nor is any one thing ever purely only masculine or feminine. As the symbolism of the yin and yang shows. They are swirling, and in each other. The yin is in the yang and the yang is in the yin in an unceasing dance. 

Yin/Yang, by Wesley Stupar (my brother), @WesleytheArch

Through physical manifestations of the yin and yang such as a person's sex, we are taught / given example about the notion of the masculine and the feminine; we are taught about God by seeing clear examples of this duality. There are countless examples of yang and yin, but no one thing is purely either male / yang or female / yin. 

God created man (the adam) male and female, as is seen on the level of the work of procreation. For it takes a man and a female biology acting together to make a baby, yet that is just one level of the masculine and feminine principles in action. On other levels individuals are/act in varying degrees of, and manifestations of masculine and feminine. This is what it means to be created both male and female in the image of God. If a man was wholly masculine and a woman wholly feminine, not only is this impossible, they would not contain a complete image of God. 


But . . . getting back to the tyet as a piece of cloth. In that way (and if it was tied on the pillar) it could be called a garment. Garment is "any article of clothing"(reduced from garnement, early 14c.), from the French garnement, from garnir "fit out, provide, adorn", from a Germanic source, from PIE root *wer- (4)
“ to cover." And cover means “to protect or defend from harm”, from same PIE root *wer- (4). So to cover is to provide welfare and secure life. The goddess used her power to cover the deceased with her protection, as symbolized by the tyet placed on the neck. 

A length of cloth or chord can be also used as a girdle / belt to secure the clothing upon a body.

Rope Cincture with Tassels

Tiet is translated as “life”, “welfare", so it is interesting that this sounds like diet. A good diet provides for ones welfare. Diet is ultimately from Latin dieta “prescribed way of life," from Greek diaita, originally "way of life, regimine, dwelling". . . Just as the garb/garment of a priest is part of his dieta [prescribed way of life], parts of which resemble a tiet.

Also djed / tet, when pronounced can sound like “jet”. Jet(v.) is "to sprout or spurt forth, shoot out", ultimately from PIE root *ye- "to throw, impel." The djed having to do with agricultural symbolism and growth could be said to be something sprouting forth, and when raised, the djed juts ("jut" from same root as "jet") upward. 

OSIRIS-REx spacecraft launch, Sept. 8, 2016

This jet propulsion rocket spacecraft, OSIRIS-REx is in the shape of a pillar as it takes off, so it is not unlike like Osiris as the djed, aye? Rockets raise us to the heavens. And GUESS WHAT? The OSIRIS-REx's return capsule is set to return to Earth September 24, 2023 
[update!], How exciting! Its retrieval (welfare) is dependent upon its parachute to bring it to a soft landing. Parachutes are made out of strong cloth and connected / tied with chords. So, is it Isis, as this cloth tie parachute, who is responsible for OSIRIS-REx's safe return?

Isis Wings Dance Garment, might double as a parachute


As is above, so is below . . .

P.S. Interestingly enough, too, the name for red ochre in ancient Egypt was "ded", dd, so not unlike djed, also dd. If a tyet was ever painted red, it would be dd (ochre) in color, and ochre (dd) is red. The tyet might even be painted with ochre, so it would be literally dd. Ochre red, blood=red. Fertility / life are associated with the red / blood earth, so, perhaps life=Tyet=red=ded=dd=Djed=Tet. 
Ochre is "ded", and without red / blood you're dead.